International Journal of Prosthodontics and Restorative Dentistry

Register      Login

VOLUME 14 , ISSUE 3 ( July-September, 2024 ) > List of Articles

ORIGINAL RESEARCH

An In Vitro Study to Evaluate the Cell Viability, Surface Characteristics, and Osteoconductive Potential of Ovine Bone Graft Modified with L-Glutamine Compared to Commercial Bone Graft

Urvi Echhpal, Khushali K Shah, Subhabrata Maiti, Lokitha Raju, Rajalakshmanan Eswaramoorthy, Deepak Nallaswamy

Keywords : 3-(4,5-dimethylthiazolyl-2)-2,5-diphenyltetrazolium bromide assay, Hydroxyapatite, L-glutamine, Ovine bone, Scanning electron microscope analysis, X-ray diffraction analysis

Citation Information : Echhpal U, Shah KK, Maiti S, Raju L, Eswaramoorthy R, Nallaswamy D. An In Vitro Study to Evaluate the Cell Viability, Surface Characteristics, and Osteoconductive Potential of Ovine Bone Graft Modified with L-Glutamine Compared to Commercial Bone Graft. Int J Prosthodont Restor Dent 2024; 14 (3):185-193.

DOI: 10.5005/jp-journals-10019-1470

License: CC BY-NC 4.0

Published Online: 30-09-2024

Copyright Statement:  Copyright © 2024; The Author(s).


Abstract

Purpose: The purpose of this study was to evaluate the cell viability, surface characteristics, and osteoconductive potential of ovine bone graft modified with L-glutamine compared to commercial bone graft. Materials and methods: Hydroxyapatite was isolated from the femur of a goat by sintering at 360°C for 3 hours (group A). L-glutamine (HIMEDIA) was introduced into the hydroxyapatite-sintered material and named as group B. Commercially available bone graft (Bio-Oss, Geistlich) serves as the control (group C). The functional groups of the samples were characterized using a Fourier transform infrared spectrophotometer (FTIR), employing the potassium bromide pellet method. The phase composition of the groups was analyzed using X-ray diffractometer. The surface morphology and pore size of the samples were examined with a scanning electron microscope (SEM). Bone formation assay (BFA) was done to check for the optical density (OD) of samples, hence portraying the osteoconductive potential of the sample. The 3-(4,5-dimethylthiazolyl-2)-2,5-diphenyltetrazolium bromide (MTT) assay technique was utilized to assess cell viability. Qualitative analysis was done using X-ray diffraction (XRD), FTIR, and SEM analysis. One-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) was done for the intergroup comparison of the BFA and MTT assays. A post hoc Tukey test was done to find the difference between the groups. Results: FTIR demonstrated the presence of specific functional groups in bone graft characterized with L-glutamine, like phosphate and carbonate whose presence indicates the presence of hydroxyapatite. XRD analysis highlighted the presence of hydroxyapatite in the sintered ovine bone samples confirming the suitability of these samples for a wide array of biomedical applications. Analysis of images obtained with SEM demonstrated a tightly bonded structure characterized by densely interwoven particles and distinct bioactive surface layers on the exterior of the bone graft characterized with L-glutamine. MTT assay demonstrated a significant difference among the three groups (p = 0.001), wherein group B demonstrated the highest values of cell viability. Findings for BFA indicate significant differences (p = 0.001) between the three groups, with group B demonstrating the highest values of bone formation assay, the other two groups, the ovine graft (group A) and control (group C) do not differ significantly (p = 0.911). Conclusion: L-glutamine positively affects natural bone graft growth, enhancing understanding of bone regulation. All characterizations demonstrated optimum qualities of the ovine bone graft characterized with L-glutamine, proving to be equivalent to commercially available bone graft, and could be made more economically viable for use in most clinical practices.


PDF Share
  1. Ponnanna AA, Maiti S, Rai N, et al. Three-dimensional-printed malo bridge: digital fixed prosthesis for the partially edentulous maxilla. Contemp Clin Dent 2021;12(4):451–453. DOI: 10.4103/ccd.ccd_456_20
  2. Leblebicioglu B, Tatakis DN. Complications following alveolar ridge augmentation procedures. Periodontol 2000 2023;93(1):221–235. DOI: 10.1111/prd.12509
  3. Agarwal S, Ashok V, Maiti S. Open- or closed-tray impression technique in implant prosthesis: a dentist's perspective. J Long Term Eff Med Implants 2020;30(3):193–198. DOI: 10.1615/JLongTermEffMedImplants.2020035933
  4. Rupawat D, Maiti S, Nallaswamy D, et al. Aesthetic outcome of implants in the anterior zone after socket preservation and conventional implant placement: a retrospective study. J Long Term Eff Med Implants 2020;30(4):233–239. DOI: 10.1615/JLongTermEffMedImplants.2020035942
  5. Maiti S, Sindhu S, Nallaswamy D. Accuracy and efficiency of two commercially available intraoral scanners under different room lighting conditions: a crossover clinical trial. Int J Prosthodont Restor Dent 2023;13(4):201–209. DOI: 10.5005/jp-journals-10019-1426
  6. Wang W, Yeung KWK. Bone grafts and biomaterials substitutes for bone defect repair: a review. Bioact Mater 2017;2(4):224–247. DOI: 10.1016/j.bioactmat.2017.05.007
  7. George R, Maiti S, Ganapathy DM. Estimation of L-carnitine levels in diabetic completely edentulous patients for implant diagnosis: a cross-sectional study. Dent Res J (Isfahan) 2023;20:96. PMID: 37810450.
  8. Zhao R, Yang R, Cooper PR, et al. Bone grafts and substitutes in dentistry: a review of current trends and developments. Molecules 2021;26(10):3007. DOI: 10.3390/molecules26103007
  9. Ganesh S, Paulraj J, Maiti S, et al. Surface roughness and wettability of green-mediated titanium, zirconium, and hydroxyapatite nanocomposite-based glass ionomer cement under toothbrushing simulation: an in vivo study. Int J Prosthodont Restor Dent 2024;14(1):30–38. DOI: 10.5005/jp-journals-10019-1441
  10. Zhang S, Li X, Qi Y, et al. Comparison of autogenous tooth materials and other bone grafts. Tissue Eng Regen Med 2021;18(3):327–341. DOI: 10.1007/s13770-021-00333-4
  11. Tang G, Liu Z, Liu Y, et al. Recent trends in the development of bone regenerative biomaterials. Front Cell Dev Biol 2021;9:665813. DOI: 10.3389/fcell.2021.665813
  12. Filippi M, Born G, Chaaban M, et al. Natural polymeric scaffolds in bone regeneration. Front Bioeng Biotechnol 2020;8:474. DOI: 10.3389/fbioe.2020.00474
  13. Ogueri KS, Jafari T, Escobar Ivirico JL, et al. Polymeric biomaterials for scaffold-based bone regenerative engineering. Regen Eng Transl Med 2019;5(2):128–154. DOI: 10.1007/s40883-018-0072-0
  14. Albrektsson T, Johansson C. Osteoinduction, osteoconduction and osseointegration. Eur Spine J 2001;10(Suppl 2):S96–S101. DOI: 10.1007/s005860100282
  15. Ferraz MP. Bone grafts in dental medicine: an overview of autografts, allografts and synthetic materials. Materials (Basel) 2023;16(11):4117. DOI: 10.3390/ma16114117
  16. Zhou T, Yang Y, Chen Q, et al. Glutamine metabolism is essential for stemness of bone marrow mesenchymal stem cells and bone homeostasis. Stem Cells Int 2019;2019:8928934. DOI: 10.1155/2019/8928934
  17. Stegen S, van Gastel N, Eelen G, et al. HIF-1α promotes glutamine-mediated redox homeostasis and glycogen-dependent bioenergetics to support postimplantation bone cell survival. Cell Metab 2016;23(2):265–279. DOI: 10.1016/j.cmet.2016.01.002
  18. Cha HS, Kim JW, Hwang JH, et al. Frequency of bone graft in implant surgery. Maxillofac Plast Reconstr Surg 2016;38(1):19. DOI: 10.1186/s40902-016-0064-2
  19. Dam VV, Trinh HA, Rokaya D, et al. Bone augmentation for implant placement: recent advances. Int J Dent 2022;2022:8900940. DOI: 10.1155/2022/8900940
  20. Ratnayake JTB, Gould ML, Shavandi A, et al. Development and characterization of a xenograft material from New Zealand sourced bovine cancellous bone. J Biomed Mater Res B Appl Biomater 2017;105(5):1054–1062. DOI: 10.1002/jbm.b.33644
  21. Koppaka R, Shah KK, Maiti S. Multifaceted enhancement of L-leucine-enriched ovine bone graft: physicochemical characteristics and osteogenic potential for improved guided bone regeneration. Cureus 2024;16(7):e64416. DOI: 10.7759/cureus.64416
  22. Yu Y, Newman H, Shen L, et al. Glutamine metabolism regulates proliferation and lineage allocation in skeletal stem cells. Cell Metab 2019;29(4):966–978.e4. DOI: 10.1016/j.cmet.2019.01.016
  23. Stegen S, Devignes CS, Torrekens S, et al. Glutamine metabolism in osteoprogenitors is required for bone mass accrual and PTH-induced bone anabolism in male mice. J Bone Miner Res 2021;36(3):604–616. DOI: 10.1002/jbmr.4219
  24. Stegen S, Rinaldi G, Loopmans S, et al. Glutamine metabolism controls chondrocyte identity and function. Dev Cell 2020;53(5):530–544.e8. DOI: 10.1016/j.devcel.2020.05.001
  25. Burduşel AC, Gherasim O, Andronescu E, et al. Inorganic nanoparticles in bone healing applications. Pharmaceutics 2022;14(4):770. DOI: 10.3390/pharmaceutics14040770
  26. Asimeng BO, Afeke DW, Tiburu EK. Biomaterial for bone and dental implants: synthesis of B-type carbonated hydroxyapatite from biogenic source. In: Biomaterials. IntechOpen; 2020.
  27. Da W, Tao L, Zhu Y. The role of osteoclast energy metabolism in the occurrence and development of osteoporosis. Front Endocrinol (Lausanne) 2021;12:675385. DOI: 10.3389/fendo.2021.675385
  28. Karunakaran N, Maiti S, Jayaraman S, et al. Assessment of bone turnover markers prior to dental implant placement for osteoporosis patient—a case-control study. Ann Dent Spec 2023;11(2):57–61. DOI: 10.51847/Z8ruHjG41y
  29. Yue H, Tian Y, Feng X, et al. Novel peptides derived from sea cucumber intestine promotes osteogenesis by upregulating integrin-mediated transdifferentiation of growth plate chondrocytes to osteoblasts. J Agric Food Chem 2022;70(41):13212–13222. DOI: 10.1021/acs.jafc.2c03458
  30. Polat O, Kilicoglu SS, Erdemli E. A controlled trial of glutamine effects on bone healing. Adv Ther 2007;24(1):154–160. DOI: 10.1007/BF02850003
  31. Hosseinzadeh E, Davarpanah M, Hassanzadeh Nemati N, et al. Fabrication of a hard tissue replacement using natural hydroxyapatite derived from bovine bones by thermal decomposition method. Int J Organ Transplant Med 2014;5(1):23–31. PMID: 25013675.
  32. Ruksudjarit A, Pengpat K, Rujijanagul G, et al. Synthesis and characterization of nanocrystalline hydroxyapatite from natural bovine bone. Curr Appl Phys 2008;8(3–4):270–272. DOI: 10.1016/j.cap.2007.10.076
  33. Yue H, Tian Y, Feng X, et al. Novel peptides from sea cucumber intestinal hydrolysates promote longitudinal bone growth in adolescent mice through accelerating cell cycle progress by regulating glutamine metabolism. Food Funct 2022;13(14):7730–7739. DOI: 10.1039/d2fo01063A
PDF Share
PDF Share

© Jaypee Brothers Medical Publishers (P) LTD.