International Journal of Prosthodontics and Restorative Dentistry

Register      Login

SEARCH WITHIN CONTENT

FIND ARTICLE

Volume / Issue

Online First

Archive
Volume  14 (2024)
Volume  13 (2023)
Volume  12 (2022)
Volume  11 (2021)
Volume  10 (2020)
Volume  9 (2019)
Volume  8 (2018)
Volume  7 (2017)
Volume  6 (2016)
Volume  5 (2015)
Volume  4 (2014)
Volume  3 (2013)
Volume  2 (2012)
Volume  1 (2011)
Related articles

VOLUME 14 , ISSUE 3 ( July-September, 2024 ) > List of Articles

ORIGINAL RESEARCH

Comparative Assessment of Adhesive Bond Strength of 25% and 50% Propolis-modified Glass Ionomer Cement to Human Dentin: An In Vitro Study

Namitha Madhamshetty, Sandhya K Punia, Rahul Bhargava, Yogender Chaudhary, Shilpi Kushwaha

Keywords : Adhesive bond strength, Glass Ionomer cement, Propolis-modified GIC, Shear bond strength, Thermocycling

Citation Information : Madhamshetty N, Punia SK, Bhargava R, Chaudhary Y, Kushwaha S. Comparative Assessment of Adhesive Bond Strength of 25% and 50% Propolis-modified Glass Ionomer Cement to Human Dentin: An In Vitro Study. Int J Prosthodont Restor Dent 2024; 14 (3):140-145.

DOI: 10.5005/jp-journals-10019-1468

License: CC BY-NC 4.0

Published Online: 30-09-2024

Copyright Statement:  Copyright © 2024; The Author(s).


Abstract

Purpose: Comparative assessment of the adhesive bond strength of conventional glass ionomer cement (GIC), 25% propolis-modified GIC and 50% propolis-modified GIC to human dentin. Materials and methods: Forty-five human permanent molars were embedded in acrylic resin block. GIC was modified with 25% ethanol-soluble liquid propolis (ESLP) solution and 50% ESLP to prepare 25% propolis-modified GIC and 50% propolis-modified GIC, respectively. The enamel was removed to expose the dentin followed by conditioning of the dentin surfaces. The samples were randomly divided into three groups: conventional GIC (group A), 25% propolis-modified GIC (group B), and 50% propolis-modified GIC (group C). Standardized-size molds were applied to the exposed dentin, and the GIC was bonded within these molds to form GIC cylinders. Shear bond strength was evaluated after incubation and thermocycling to simulate the oral environment using a universal testing machine. The statistical analysis was performed using one-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) and post hoc Tukey's test. Results: There was significant difference (p = 0.001) in adhesive bond strength among different groups. The highest mean adhesive bond strength (2.287 ± 0.372 MPa) was noticed in group B (25% propolis-modified GIC), followed by group A (conventional GIC 2.200 ± 0.853 MPa), and then group C (50% propolis-modified GIC 2.200 ± 0.853 MPa. There was statistically significant difference between conventional GIC and 25% propolis-modified GIC (p = 0.002) and 25% propolis-modified GIC and 50% propolis-modified GIC groups (p = 0.001). Conclusion: 25% propolis-modified GIC showed the most significant improvement in bond strength of conventional GIC. 50% propolis-modified GIC showed a deleterious effect. The 25% propolis-modified GIC seems to have the potential to improve clinical performance of restoration.

PDF Share
  1. Deepalakshmi M, Poori S, Miglani R, et al. Evaluation of the antibacterial and physical properties of glass ionomer cements containing chlorhexidine and cetrimide: an in vitro study. Indian J Dent Res 2010;21:552–556. DOI: 10.4103/0970-9290.74217
  2. Sidhu SK, Nicholson JW. A review of glass-ionomer cements for clinical dentistry. J Funct Biomater 2016;7(3):16. DOI: 10.3390/jfb7030016
  3. Ge KX, Quock R, Chu CH, et al. The preventive effect of glass ionomer cement restorations on secondary caries formation: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Dent Mater 2023;39(12):e1–e17. DOI: 10.1016/j.dental.2023.10.008
  4. Saridena US, Sanka GS, Alla RK, et al. An overview of advances in glass ionomer cements. Int J Dent Mater 2022;4(4):89–94. DOI: 10.37983/IJDM.2022.4403
  5. Abdelhafeez BR, Niazy MA, Naguib EA, et al. Fluoride release of conventional glass ionomer modified with flax fibers and ethanolic extract of propolis. Future Dent J 2021;6(1).
  6. Preetham HS, Kumar NK, Brigit B. Quantitative assessment of transforming growth factor-β1 release from dentin matrix upon conditioning with ethylene diamine tetra-acetate, doxycycline hydrochloride, and propolis: an in vitro study. J Conserv Dent Endod 2023;26(5):564–568. DOI: 10.4103/JCDE.JCDE_16_23
  7. Subramaniam P, Girish Babu KL, Neeraja G, et al. Does addition of propolis to glass ionomer cement alter its physicomechanical properties? An in vitro study. J Clin Pediatr Dent 2016;40(5):400–403. DOI: 10.17796/1053-4628-40.5.400
  8. Elmenshawy MZ, El-Haliem HA, Mowafy AM, et al. Effect of ethanolic extract of propolis on antibacterial and microshear bond strength of glass-ionomer restorations to dentin. Heliyon 2023;10(1):e23710. DOI: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2023.e23710
  9. Somani R, Jaidka S, Singh DJ, et al. Comparative evaluation of shear bond strength of various glass ionomer cements to dentin of primary teeth: an in vitro study. Int J Clin Pediatr Dent 2016;9(3):192–196. DOI: 10.5005/jp-journals-10005-1362
  10. Paulraj J, Nagar P. Antimicrobial efficacy of triphala and propolis-modified glass ionomer cement: an in vitro study. Int J Clin Pediatr Dent 2020;13(5):457–462. DOI: 10.5005/jp-journals-10005-1806
  11. Biria M, Torabzadeh H, Sheikh-Al-Eslamian SM, et al. Effect of propolis aqueous extract on antimicrobial activity and flexural strength of conventional and highly viscose glass ionomer. Shiraz E Med J 2022;23(2):e112680. DOI: 10.5812/semj.112680
  12. Neelima B, Reddy JS, Singh PT, et al. Comparative evaluation of antimicrobial efficacy of glass ionomer cement added with propolis, chitosan, and chlorhexidine against Streptococcus mutans and Lactobacillus acidophilus: An in vitro study. J Indian Soc Pedod Prev Dent 2020;38(4):367–373. DOI: 10.4103/JISPPD.JISPPD_322_20
  13. Eliasson ST, Dahl JE. Effect of thermal cycling on temperature changes and bond strength in different test specimens. Biomater Investig Dent 2020;7(1):16–24. DOI: 10.1080/26415275.2019.1709470
  14. Nagaraja Upadhya P, Kishore G. Glass ionomer cement—the different generations. Trends Biomater Artif Organs 2005;18(2):158–165.
  15. Vishakha V, Shivani M, Vinod S, et al. Evaluation of compressive strength, shear bond strength, and microhardness values of glass-ionomer cement Type IX and Cention N. J Conserv Dent 2020;23(6):550–553. DOI: 10.4103/JCD.JCD_109_19
  16. Pooja S, Manish J, Kashika A, et al. Comparison of shear bond strength of packable glass ionomer cement, resin modified glass ionomer cement, compomer and giomer to primary and permanent teeth—an in vitro study. J Evolution Med Dent Sci 2021;10(19):1429–1434. DOI: 10.14260/jemds/2021/301
  17. Sharafeddin F, Alavi AA, Siabani S, et al. Comparison of shear bond strength of three types of glass ionomer cements containing hydroxyapatite nanoparticles to deep and superficial dentin. J Dent (Shiraz) 2020;21(2):132–140. DOI: 10.30476/DENTJODS.2019.77762.0
  18. Freitas AS, Cunha A, Parpot P, et al. Propolis efficacy: the quest for eco-friendly solvents. Molecules 2022;27(21):7531. DOI: 10.3390/molecules27217531
  19. Rezende GPSR, Pimenta FC, Costa LRRS. Antimicrobial activity of two Brazilian commercial propolis extracts. Braz J Oral Sci 2006;5:967–970. DOI: 10.20396/bjos.v516.8641876
  20. Troca VB, Fernandes KB, Terrile AE, et al. Effect of green propolis addition to physical mechanical properties of glass ionomer cements. J Appl Oral Sci 2011; 19(2):100–105. DOI: 10.1590/s1678-77572011000200004
  21. Meneses IHC, Sampaio GAM, Carvalho FG, et al. In vivo biocompatibility, mechanical, and antibacterial properties of cements modified with propolis in different concentrations. Eur J Dent 2020;14(1):77–84. DOI: 10.1055/s-0040-1702255
  22. Prabhakar AR, Balehosur DV, Basappa N. Comparative evaluation of shear bond strength and fluoride release of conventional glass ionomer with 1% ethanolic extract of propolis incorporated glass ionomer cement—in vitro study. J Clin Diagn Res 2016;10(5):ZC88–ZC91. DOI: 10.7860/JCDR/2016/17056.7818
  23. Hatunoğlu E, Oztürk F, Bilenler T, et al. Antibacterial and mechanical properties of propolis added to glass ionomer cement. Angle Orthod 2014;84(2):368–373. DOI: 10.2319/020413-101.1
  24. Panahandeh N, Adinehlou F, Sheikh-Al-Eslamian SM, et al. Extract of propolis on resin-modified glass ionomer cement: effect on mechanical and antimicrobial properties and dentin bonding strength. Int J Biomater 2021;2021:5597837. DOI: 10.1155/2021/5597837
  25. Altunsoy M, Tanrıver M, Türkan U, et al. In vitro evaluation of microleakage and microhardness of ethanolic extracts of propolis in different proportions added to glass ionomer cement. J Clin Pediatr Dent 2016;40(2):136–140. DOI: 10.17796/1053-4628-40.2.136
  26. de Morais Sampaio GA, Lacerda-Santos R, Cavalcanti YW, et al. Antimicrobial properties, mechanics, and fluoride release of ionomeric cements modified by red propolis. Angle Orthod 2021;91(4):522–527. DOI: 10.2319/083120-759.1
PDF Share
PDF Share

© Jaypee Brothers Medical Publishers (P) LTD.