Evaluation of Composite Restoration in Posterior Teeth with Proanthocyanidin Pretreatment Liner Using Fédération Dentaire Internationale Criteria: A Split-mouth Randomized Controlled Trial
Lakshmi C Padarthi, Lavanya Anumula, Suneel K Chinni, Swapna Sannapureddy, Sindhu Ramesh
Citation Information :
Padarthi LC, Anumula L, Chinni SK, Sannapureddy S, Ramesh S. Evaluation of Composite Restoration in Posterior Teeth with Proanthocyanidin Pretreatment Liner Using Fédération Dentaire Internationale Criteria: A Split-mouth Randomized Controlled Trial. Int J Prosthodont Restor Dent 2023; 13 (4):191-200.
Purpose: A split-mouth randomized controlled trial (RCT) to evaluate the impact of a 2% proanthocyanidin (PAC) pretreatment liner on the clinical durability of posterior composite restorations.
Materials and methods: A parallel double-blinded split-mouth RCT adhering to Consolidated Standards of Reporting Trials (CONSORT) guidelines was conducted. A 2% PAC solution was prepared for pretreatment. A total of 44 participants meeting inclusion criteria received composite restorations, each receiving one restoration with PAC liner and one without (test and control). Clinical evaluations include esthetic, functional, and biological aspects over a 6-month and 1-year follow-up period using Fédération Dentaire Internationale (FDI) criteria. Fisher exact test was employed to analyze the differences in ratings between the two groups.
Results: No significant differences were observed between the two groups (p < 0.05). Staining was minimal and comparable between the two groups; neither group experienced postoperative sensitivity or recurrent caries. Both groups exhibited excellent outcomes in surface luster, color match, translucency, and marginal adaptation, with no significant differences between groups. Staining, postoperative sensitivity, and recurrent caries were minimal and comparable. General and oral health remained favorable in both groups during follow-up.
Conclusion: Around 2% PAC pretreatment enhances the clinical durability of posterior composite restorations, leading to excellent esthetic, functional, and biological outcomes. PAC represents a promising dentin biomodification agent for improving restoration performance and longevity.
Cho K, Rajan G, Farrar P, et al. Dental resin composites: a review on materials to product realizations. Composites Part B. Engineering 2022;230:109495. DOI: 10.1016/j.compositesb.2021.109495
Cramer NB, Stansbury JW, Bowman CN. Recent advances and developments in composite dental restorative materials. J Dent Res 2011;90(4):402–416. DOI: 10.1177/0022034510381263
Nedeljkovic I, Teughels W, De Munck J, et al. Is secondary caries with composites a material-based problem? Dent Mater 2015;31(11):e247–e277. DOI: 10.1016/j.dental.2015.09.001
Perdigão J, Reis A, Loguercio AD. Dentin adhesion and MMPs: a comprehensive review. J Esthet Restor Dent 2013;25(4):219–241. DOI: 10.1111/jerd.12016
Chaussain-Miller C, Fioretti F, Goldberg M, et al. The role of matrix metalloproteinases (MMPs) in human caries. J Dent Res 2006;85(1):22–32. DOI: 10.1177/154405910608500104
Hashimoto M, Ohno H, Kaga M, et al. In vivo degradation of resin-dentin bonds in humans over 1 to 3 years. J Dent Res 2000;79(6):1385–1391. DOI: 10.1177/00220345000790060601
Mazzoni A, Pashley D, Nishitani Y, et al. Reactivation of inactivated endogenous proteolytic activities in phosphoric acid-etched dentine by etch-and-rinse adhesives. Biomaterials 2006;27(25):4470–4476. DOI: 10.1016/j.biomaterials.2006.01.040
Betancourt DE, Baldion PA, Castellanos JE. Resin-dentin bonding interface: mechanisms of degradation and strategies for stabilization of the hybrid layer. Int J Biomaterial 2019;2019:e5268342. DOI: 10.1155/2019/5268342
Bedran-Russo AK, Pauli GF, et al. Dentin biomodification: strategies, renewable resources and clinical applications. Dent Material 2014;30(1):62–76. DOI: 10.1016/j.dental.2013.10.012
Facino RM, Carini M, Aldini G, et al. Diet enriched with procyanidins enhances antioxidant activity and reduces myocardial post-ischaemic damage in rats. Life Sci 1999;64(8):627–642. DOI: 10.1016/s0024-3205(98)00605-5
Rauf A, Imran M, Abu-Izneid T, et al. Proanthocyanidins: a comprehensive review. Biomed Pharmacother 2019;116:108999. DOI: 10.1016/j.biopha.2019.108999
Hagerman AE, Butler LG. The specificity of proanthocyanidin-protein interactions. J Biol Chem 1981;256(9):4494–4497.
Philip N, Walsh LJ. Cranberry polyphenols: natural weapons against dental caries. Dent J (Basel) 2019;7(1):20. DOI: 10.3390/dj7010020
Wang Y, Chen C, Zang HL, et al. The recovery effect of proanthocyanidin on microtensile bond strength to sodium hypochlorite-treated dentine. Int Endod J 2019;52(3):371–376. DOI: 10.1111/iej.13005
Green B, Yao X, Ganguly A, et al. Grape seed proanthocyanidins increase collagen biodegradation resistance in the dentin/adhesive interface when included in an adhesive. J Dent 2010;38(11):908–915. DOI: 10.1016/j.jdent.2010.08.004
Han B, Jaurequi J, Tang BW, et al. Proanthocyanidin: a natural crosslinking reagent for stabilizing collagen matrices. J Biomed Mater Res 2003;65(1):118–124. DOI: 10.1002/jbm.a.10460
Liu RR, Fang M, Zhang L, et al. Anti-proteolytic capacity and bonding durability of proanthocyanidin-biomodified demineralized dentin matrix. Int J Oral Sci 2014;6(3):168–174. DOI: 10.1038/ijos.2014.22
Kalra M, Iqbal K, Nitisusanta LI, et al. The effect of proanthocyanidins on the bond strength and durability of resin sealer to root dentine. Int Endod J 2013;46(2):169–178. DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2591.2012.02106.x
Schulz KF, Altman DG, Moher D, et al. CONSORT 2010 Statement: updated guidelines for reporting parallel group randomised trials. BMJ 2010;340:c332. DOI: 10.1136/bmj.c332
Ismail AI. The International Caries Detection and Assessment System (ICDAS II).
Gajjela RS, Satish RK, Sajjan GS, et al. Comparative evaluation of chlorhexidine, grape seed extract, riboflavin/chitosan modification on microtensile bond strength of composite resin to dentin after polymerase chain reaction thermocycling: an in vitro study. J Conserv Dent 2017;20(2):120–124. DOI: 10.4103/0972-0707.212241
Hickel R, Peschke A, Tyas M, et al. FDI World Dental Federation: clinical criteria for the evaluation of direct and indirect restorations—update and clinical examples. Clin Oral Invest 2010;14(4):349–366. DOI: 10.1007/s00784-010-0432-8
Cai J, Palamara JEA, Burrow MF. Effects of collagen crosslinkers on dentine: a literature review. Calcif Tissue Int 2018;102(3):265–279. DOI: 10.1007/s00223-017-0343-7
Anumula L, Ramesh S, Kolaparthi VSK, et al. Role of natural cross linkers in resin–dentin bond durability: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Materials (Basel) 2022;15(16):5650. DOI: 10.3390/ma15165650
De Souza LC, Rodrigues NS, Cunha DA, et al. Two-year clinical evaluation of proanthocyanidins added to a two-step etch-and-rinse adhesive. J Dent 2019;81:7–16. DOI: 10.1016/j.jdent.2018.12.012
Epasinghe DJ, Burrow MF, Yiu CKY. Effect of proanthocyanidin on ultrastructure and mineralization of dentine collagen. Arch Oral Biol 2017;84:29–36. DOI: 10.1016/j.archoralbio.2017.09.012
Epasinghe DJ, Yiu CKY, Burrow MF. Effect of proanthocyanidin incorporation into dental adhesive on durability of resin–dentin bond. Int J Adhes Adhesiv 2015;63:145–151. DOI: 10.1016/j.ijadhadh.2015.09.006
Amaral CM, Peris AR, Ambrosano GMB, et al. Microleakage and gap formation of resin composite restorations polymerized with different techniques. Am J Dent 2004;17(3):156–160.
Elgezawi M, Haridy R, Abdalla MA, et al. Current strategies to control recurrent and residual caries with resin composite restorations: operator- and material-related factors. J Clin Med 2022;11(21):6591. DOI: 10.3390/jcm11216591