International Journal of Prosthodontics and Restorative Dentistry

Register      Login

VOLUME 12 , ISSUE 1 ( January-March, 2022 ) > List of Articles

EDITORIAL

Reporting of Implant Positions in Completely Edentulous Arches Needs to be Standardized

Pravinkumar G Patil

Citation Information : Patil PG. Reporting of Implant Positions in Completely Edentulous Arches Needs to be Standardized. Int J Prosthodont Restor Dent 2022; 12 (1):3-4.

DOI: 10.5005/jp-journals-10019-1360

License: CC BY-NC 4.0

Published Online: 18-10-2022

Copyright Statement:  Copyright © 2022; The Author(s).


Abstract

PDF Share
  1. Messias A, Nicolau P, Guerra F. Different interventions for rehabilitation of the edentulous maxilla with implant-supported prostheses: an overview of systematic reviews. Int J Prosthodont 2021;34:s63–s84. DOI: 10.11607/ijp.7162
  2. Feine JS, Carlsson GE, Awad MA, et al. The McGill consensus statement on overdentures. Mandibular two-implant overdentures as first choice standard of care for edentulous patients. Gerodontology 2002;19(1):3–4.
  3. Patil PG, Seow LL. Crestal bone-level changes and patient satisfaction with mandibular overdentures retained by one or two implants with immediate loading protocols: A randomized controlled clinical study. J Prosthet Dent 2020;123(5):710–716. DOI: 10.1016/j.prosdent.2019.07.015
  4. de Luna Gomes JM, Lemos CAA, Santiago Junior JF, et al. Optimal number of implants for complete-arch implant-supported prostheses with a follow-up of at least 5 years: A systematic review and meta-analysis. J Prosthet Dent 2019;121(5):766–774.e3. DOI: 10.1016/j.prosdent.2018.06.001
  5. Papaspyridakos P, Mokti M, Chen CJ, et al. Implant and prosthodontic survival rates with implant fixed complete dental prostheses in the edentulous mandible after at least 5 years: a systematic review. Clin Implant Dent Relat Res 2014;16(5):705–717. DOI: 10.1111/cid.12036
  6. ELsyad MA, Maryod WH, Mostafa AZ. Effect of implant position on clinical and radiographic outcomes of locator-retained mandibular overdentures: a 1-year prospective study. J Prosthodont 2019;28(2):e699–e704. DOI: 10.1111/jopr.12780
  7. Takagaki K, Gonda T, Maeda Y. Number and location of mini-implants retaining a mandibular overdenture to resist lateral forces: a preliminary in vitro study. Int J Prosthodont 2017;30(3):248–250. DOI: 10.11607/ijp.4995
  8. Voon YS, Patil PG. Safe zone in anterior mandible related to the genial tubercle for implant osteotomy in a Chinese-Malaysian population: A CBCT study. J Prosthet Dent 2018;119(4):568–573. DOI: 10.1016/j.prosdent.2017.05.011
  9. Hong HR, Pae A, Kim Y, et al. Effect of implant position, angulation, and attachment height on peri-implant bone stress associated with mandibular two-implant overdentures: a finite element analysis. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 2012;27(5):e69–76.
  10. Patil PG, Seow LL, Uddanwadikar R, et al. Stress and strain patterns of 2-implant mandibular overdentures with different positions and angulations of implants: A 3D finite element analysis study. J Prosthet Dent 2022. DOI: 10.1016/j.prosdent.2021.07.025
PDF Share
PDF Share

© Jaypee Brothers Medical Publishers (P) LTD.