International Journal of Prosthodontics and Restorative Dentistry

Register      Login

SEARCH WITHIN CONTENT

FIND ARTICLE

Volume / Issue

Online First

Archive
Volume  14 (2024)
Volume  13 (2023)
Volume  12 (2022)
Volume  11 (2021)
Volume  10 (2020)
Volume  9 (2019)
Volume  8 (2018)
Volume  7 (2017)
Volume  6 (2016)
Volume  5 (2015)
Volume  4 (2014)
Volume  3 (2013)
Volume  2 (2012)
Volume  1 (2011)
Related articles

VOLUME 11 , ISSUE 3 ( July-September, 2021 ) > List of Articles

ORIGINAL RESEARCH

Effect of Thermal Cycling on the Marginal Fit of Provisional Restorations Fabricated Using Three Different Materials: An In Vitro Study

Lokesh B Kanchan, Basawakumar Majage, Arati Hoskhande, Manju George

Keywords : CAD/CAM PMMA resin, Marginal gap, Protemp II, Self-cure, Temporary restoration

Citation Information : Kanchan LB, Majage B, Hoskhande A, George M. Effect of Thermal Cycling on the Marginal Fit of Provisional Restorations Fabricated Using Three Different Materials: An In Vitro Study. Int J Prosthodont Restor Dent 2021; 11 (3):119-124.

DOI: 10.5005/jp-journals-10019-1326

License: CC BY-NC 4.0

Published Online: 01-02-2022

Copyright Statement:  Copyright © 2021; The Author(s).


Abstract

Aim and objective: This study aimed to evaluate and compare the marginal fit of different provisional restorations before and after thermal cycling. Materials and methods: The study consisted of three main groups of provisional materials, i.e., bisphenol A-glycidyl methacrylate (Bis-GMA) resin (Protemp II), polymethylmethacrylate (PMMA) self-cure tooth-colored resin, and computer-aided design/computer-aided manufacturing (CAD/CAM) PMMA resin. The groups were further subdivided into 2 subgroups with each having 10 specimens. A typhodont mandibular right first molar was prepared for a full veneer restoration and was cast in a base metal alloy. Polyvinyl siloxane putty index of the master die was prepared and poured with die stone. The provisional crowns were fabricated on these dies and cemented. Conditioning of the specimens was done by storing them in artificial saliva for 10 days. Thermal cycling of the experimental group was done by immersing the samples in two temperature-controlled water baths; 5°C (cold bath) and 55°C (hot bath). The samples were tested by stereomicroscope to find the marginal discrepancies. Paired t-test was done to evaluate the change between baseline to follow-up. Intergroup comparison was analyzed using one-way ANOVA followed by post hoc Tukey's test to compare the mean of measurements. Results: The mean marginal discrepancies were Protemp II (21.8750 ± 3.30 μm), CAD/CAM resin (16.6500 ± 8.14 μm), and self-cure tooth-colored resin (24.2250 ± 3.26 μm) for the provisional crowns. A significant difference was seen in the mean marginal discrepancy of crowns fabricated with Protemp II, CAD-CAM resin, and self-cure tooth molding powder (p = 0.013). Conclusion: The types of materials and the thermal cycling process had a significant effect on the marginal gap of interim restorations. The Bis-GMA resin and CAD/CAM PMMA resin exhibited better marginal adaptability than the PMMA self-cure tooth-colored resin groups, both before and after thermal cycling.

HTML PDF Share
  1. Digholkar S, Madhav VN, Palaskar J. Evaluation of the flexural strength and microhardness of provisional crown and bridge materials fabricated by different methods. J Indian Prosthodon Soc 2016;16(4):328. DOI: 10.4103/0972-4052.191288.
  2. Yao J, Li J, Wang Y, et al. Comparison of the flexural strength and marginal accuracy of traditional and CAD/CAM interim materials before and after thermal cycling. J Prosthet Dent 2014;112(3):649–657. DOI: 10.1016/j.prosdent.2014.01.012.
  3. Nejatidanesh F, Azadbakht K, Savabi O, et al. Effect of repeated firing on the translucency of CAD-CAM monolithic glass-ceramics. J Prosthet Dent 2020;123(3):530.e1–530.e6. DOI: 10.1016/j.prosdent.2019.10.028.
  4. Ehrenberg DS, Weiner S. Changes in marginal gap size of provisional resin crowns after occlusal loading and thermal cycling. J Prosthet Dent 2000;84(2):139–148. DOI: 10.1067/mpr.2000.108027.
  5. Koumjian JH, Holmes JB. Marginal accuracy of provisional restorative materials. J Prosthet Dent 1990;63(6):639–642. DOI: 10.1016/0022-3913(90)90320-c.
  6. Moulding MB, Loney RW, Ritsco RG. Marginal accuracy of provisional restorations fabricated by different techniques. Int J Prosthodont 1994;7(5):468–472.
  7. Gujjari AK, Bhatnagar VM, Basavaraju RM. Color stability and flexural strength of poly (methyl methacrylate) and bis-acrylic composite based provisional crown and bridge auto-polymerizing resins exposed to beverages and food dye: an in vitro study. Indian J Dent Res 2013;24(2):172. DOI: 10.4103/0970-9290.116672.
  8. Keyf F, Anil N. The effect of margin design on the marginal adaptation of temporary crowns. J Oral Rehabil 1994;21(4):367–371. DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2842.1994.tb01151.x.
  9. Robinson FB, Hovijitra S. Marginal integrity of direct temporary crowns. J Prosthet Dent 1982;47(4):390–392. DOI: 10.1016/s0022-3913(82)80087-5.
  10. Holmes JR, Bayne SC, Holland GA, et al. Considerations in measurement of marginal fit. J Prosthet Dent 1989;62(4):405–408. DOI: 10.1016/0022-3913(89)90170-4.
  11. Shillingburg HT, Hobo S, Whitsett LD. Fundamentals of fixed prosthodontics. 4rd ed., Quintessence Publishing CO, Inc; 2012.
  12. Christensen GJ. The fastest and best provisional restorations. J Am Dent Assoc 2003;134(5):637–639. DOI: 10.14219/jada.archive.2003.0233.
  13. Abdullah AO, Tsitrou EA, Pollington S. Comparative in vitro evaluation of CAD/CAM vs conventional provisional crowns. J Appl Oral Sci 2016;24(3):258–263. DOI: 10.1590/1678-775720150451.
  14. Mai HN, Lee KB, Lee DH. Fit of interim crowns fabricated using photopolymer-jetting 3D printing. J Prosthet Dent 2017;118(2):208–215. DOI: 10.1016/j.prosdent.2016.10.030.
  15. Rakhshan V. Marginal integrity of provisional resin restoration materials: a review of the literature. Saudi J Dent Res 2015;6(1):33–40. DOI: 10.1016/j.sjdr.2014.03.002.
  16. Balkenhol M, Knapp M, Ferger P, et al. Correlation between polymerization shrinkage and marginal fit of temporary crowns. Dent Mater 2008;24(11):1575–1584. DOI: 10.1016/j.dental.2008.07.001.
  17. Dureja I, Yadav B, Malhotra P, et al. A comparative evaluation of vertical marginal fit of provisional crowns fabricated by computer-aided design/computer-aided manufacturing technique and direct (intraoral technique) and flexural strength of the materials: an in vitro study. J Indian Prosthodont Soc 2018;18(4):314–320. DOI: 10.4103/jips.jips_306_17.
  18. Amin BM, Aras MA, Chitre V. A comparative evaluation of the marginal accuracy of crowns fabricated from four commercially available provisional materials: an in vitro study. Contemp Clin Dent 2015;6(2):161–165. DOI: 10.4103/0976-237X.156035.
  19. Kim SH, Watts DC. Polymerization shrinkage-strain kinetics of temporary crown and bridge materials. Dent Mater 2004;20(1):88–95. DOI: 10.1016/s0109-5641(03)00101-5.
  20. Edelhoff D, Beuer F, Schweiger J, et al. CAD/CAM-generated high-density polymer restorations for the pretreatment of complex cases: a case report. Quintessence Int 2012;43(6):457–467.
  21. Elagra MI, Rayyan MR, Alhomaidhi MM, et al. Color stability and marginal integrity of interim crowns: an in vitro study. Eur J Dent 2017;11(3):330–334. DOI: 10.4103/ejd.ejd_66_17.
  22. Angwarawong T, Reeponmaha T, Angwaravong O. Influence of thermomechanical aging on marginal gap of CAD-CAM and conventional interim restorations. J Prosthet Dent 2020;124(5):566-e1. DOI: 10.1016/j.prosdent.2020.03.036.
  23. Ehrenberg D, Weiner GI, Weiner S. Long-term effects of storage and thermal cycling on the marginal adaptation of provisional resin crowns: a pilot study. J Prosthet Dent 2006;95(3):230–236. DOI: 10.1016/j.prosdent.2005.12.012.
PDF Share
PDF Share

© Jaypee Brothers Medical Publishers (P) LTD.