International Journal of Prosthodontics and Restorative Dentistry

Register      Login

VOLUME 10 , ISSUE 1 ( January-March, 2020 ) > List of Articles

CASE REPORT

Computer-aided Design and Computer-aided Manufacturing Restorations with Minimal Invasive Approaches

Emine Mustafaoğlu, Özge Ünal, Bora Bağış

Keywords : All-ceramic restorations, CAD/CAM, Minimal invasive

Citation Information : Mustafaoğlu E, Ünal Ö, Bağış B. Computer-aided Design and Computer-aided Manufacturing Restorations with Minimal Invasive Approaches. Int J Prosthodont Restor Dent 2020; 10 (1):39-43.

DOI: 10.5005/jp-journals-10019-1258

License: CC BY-NC 4.0

Published Online: 01-08-2018

Copyright Statement:  Copyright © 2020; The Author(s).


Abstract

Implant-supported crowns, full-coverage fixed dental prostheses and inlay-retained fixed partial prostheses are treatment methods typically used for the rehabilitation of a single missing posterior tooth. With the increasing emphasis on conservative treatment in dentistry, inlay-retained adhesive restorations are becoming popular. With the progress of computer-aided design and computer-aided manufacturing (CAD/CAM) technology, ceramic restorations in the posterior region can be fabricated with sufficient esthetic and mechanical properties. This case report illustrates an alternative approach to the rehabilitation of narrow edentulous spaces with ceramic materials by CAD/CAM technique with minimally invasive approaches.


HTML PDF Share
  1. Xie Q, Lassila LVP, Vallittu PK. Comparison of load-bearing capacity of direct resin-bonded fiber-reinforced composite FPDs with four framework designs. J Dent 2007;35(7):578–582. DOI: 10.1016/j.jdent.2007.04.003.
  2. Jung RE, Zembic A, Pjetursson BE, et al. Systematic review of the survival rate and the incidence of biological, technical, and aesthetic complications of single crowns on implants reported in longitudinal studies with a mean follow-up of 5 years. Clin Oral İmplants Res 2012;23(Suppl 6):2–21. DOI: 10.1111/j.1600-0501.2012.02547.x.
  3. Karaarslan ES, Ertas E, Ozsevik S, et al. Conservative approach for restoring posterior missing tooth with fiber reinforcement materials: four clinical report. Eur J Dent 2011;5(4):465–471. DOI: 10.1055/s-0039-1698920.
  4. Russo DS, Cinelli F, Sarti C, et al. Adhesion to zirconia: a systematic review of current conditioning methods and bonding materials. Dent J 2019;7:74. DOI: 10.3390/dj7030074.
  5. Schmitter M, Mueller D, Rues S. Chipping behaviour of all-ceramic crowns with zirconia framework and cad/cam manufactured veneer. J Dent 2012;40(2):154–162. DOI: 10.1016/j.jdent.2011.12.007.
  6. Tinschert J, Natt G, Mohrbotter N, et al. Lifetime of alümina and zirconia ceramics used for crown and bridge restorations. J Biomed Mater Res 2007;80(2):317–321. DOI: 10.1002/jbm.b.30599.
  7. Khan AA, Al Kheraif AA, Jamaluddin S, et al. Recent trends in surface treatment methods for bonding composite cement to zirconia: a review. J Adhes Dent 2017;19(1):7–19.
  8. Atsu SS, Kilicarslan MA, Kucukesmen HC, et al. Effect of zirconium oxide ceramic surface treatments on the bond strength to adhesive resin. J Prosthet Dent 2006;95(6):430–436. DOI: 10.1016/j.prosdent.2006.03.016.
  9. Lima RBW, Barreto SC, Alfrisany NM, et al. Effect of silane and MDP-based primers on physico-chemical properties of zirconia and its bond strength to resin cement. Dent Mater 2019;35(11):1557–1567. DOI: 10.1016/j.dental.2019.07.008.
  10. Lim MJ, Yu MK, Lee KW. The effect of continuous application of MDP-containing primer and luting resin cement on bond strength to tribochemical silica-coated Y-TZP. Restor Dent Endod 2018;43(2):19. DOI: 10.5395/rde.2018.43.e19.
  11. Palin W, Burke FJ. Trends in indirect dentistry:8.CAD/CAM technology. Dent Update 2005;32(10):566–572. DOI: 10.12968/denu.2005.32.10.566.
  12. Augusti D, Augusti G, Borgonovo A, et al. Inlay-retained fixed dental prosthesis: a clinical option using monolithic zirconia. Case Rep Dent 2014;2014:629786. DOI: 10.1155/2014/629786.
  13. Kern M. Bonding to oxide ceramics-laboratory testing versus clinical outcome. Dent Mater 2015;31(1):8–14. DOI: 10.1016/j.dental.2014.06.007.
  14. Zandparsa R, Talua NA, Finkelman MD, et al. An in vitro comparison of shear bond strength of zirconia to enamel using different surface treatments. J Prosthodont 2014;23:117–123. DOI: 10.1111/jopr.12075.
  15. Chen JH, Matsumura H, Atsuta M. Effect of etchant, etching period, and silane priming on bond strength to porcelain of composite resin. Oper Dent 1998;23(5):250–257.
  16. Brentel AS, Özcan M, Valandro LF, et al. Microtensile bond strength of a resin cement to feldpathic ceramic after different etching and silanization regimens in dry and aged conditions. Dent Mater 2007;23(11):1323–1331. DOI: 10.1016/j.dental.2006.11.011.
  17. Graiff L, Piovan C, Vigolo P, et al. Shear bond strength between feldspathic CAD/CAM ceramic and human dentine for two adhesive cements. J Prosthodont 2008;17(4):294–299. DOI: 10.1111/j.1532-849X.2007.00294.x.
  18. Sailer I, Pjetursson BE, Zwahlen M, et al. A systematic review of the survival and complication rates of all-ceramic and metal ceramic reconstructions after an observation period of at least 3 years. Part II: fixed dental prostheses. Clin Oral Implants Res 2007;18:86–96. DOI: 10.1111/j.1600-0501.2007.01468.x.
  19. Ueda K, Guth JF, Erdelt K, et al. Light transmittance by a multi-coloured zirconia material. Dent Mater J 2015;34(3):310–314. DOI: 10.4012/dmj.2014-238.
  20. Zarone F, Di Mauro MI, Ausiello P, et al. Current status on lithium disilicate and zirconia: a narrative review. BMC Oral Health 2019;19(1):134. DOI: 10.1186/s12903-019-0838-x.
  21. Rinke S, Fischer C. Range of indications for translucent zirconia modifications: clinical and technical aspects. Quintessence Int 2013;44(8):557–566.
  22. Moscovitch M. Consecutive case series of monolithic and minimally veneered zirconia restorations on teeth and implants: up to 68 months. Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent 2015;35(3):315–323. DOI: 10.11607/prd.2270.
  23. Bomicke W, Rammelsberg P, Stober T, et al. Short-term prospective clinical evaluation of monolithic and partially veneered zirconia single crowns. J Esthet Restor Dent 2017;29(1):22–30. DOI: 10.1111/jerd.12270.
PDF Share
PDF Share

© Jaypee Brothers Medical Publishers (P) LTD.