International Journal of Prosthodontics and Restorative Dentistry

Register      Login

VOLUME 7 , ISSUE 2 ( April-June, 2017 ) > List of Articles

RESEARCH ARTICLE

Corrosion Resistance of indigenously Fabricated Dental Magnets for Application in Prosthodontics

Ramesh K Nadiger, Satyabodh S Guttal

Citation Information : Nadiger RK, Guttal SS. Corrosion Resistance of indigenously Fabricated Dental Magnets for Application in Prosthodontics. Int J Prosthodont Restor Dent 2017; 7 (2):48-52.

DOI: 10.5005/jp-journals-10019-1176

License: CC BY 3.0

Published Online: 01-06-2017

Copyright Statement:  Copyright © 2017; Jaypee Brothers Medical Publishers (P) Ltd.


Abstract

Aim

The aim of the study is to evaluate the corrosion resistance of the indigenously fabricated dental magnet.

Materials and methods

The Teflon-encased Neodymium-Iron-Boron (Nd–Fe–B) magnet was put to test to comply with the standardized conditions. The corrosion behavior was examined using the statistical immersion analysis according to the International Organization for Standardization (ISO) 10271:2001: “Dental metallic materials corrosion test methods.” In this method, the maximum ion release after 7 days was evaluated. The test specimen (magnet) was dipped in corrosive solution for 7 days in polypropylene test tube. Both the control and test magnets were dipped in artificial saliva. The pH of artificial saliva was adjusted to 6.75. After 7 days, the eluate solution was subjected to inductively coupled plasma spectroscopy evaluation to trace the amount of metal ions leached out from the magnets.

Results

The mean values for Nd, Fe, and B were 329, 532, and 316 µg/cm2 respectively. According to the ISO standards, the tested product values of ions leached out should be within the value of 200 µg/cm2. The release of corrosion products stayed significantly under the limit as specified by the ISO standard 22674:2006 for all the specimens in the test groups.

Conclusion

Within the limitations of the study, the indigenously fabricated dental magnet had negligible corrosion in comparison with the control group.

Clinical significance

Magnetic attachments have most commonly been used for the retention of mandibular overdentures. Patients with magnet-retained overdentures have reported a high degree of satisfaction with their dentures. Due to the lack of indigenous fabrication and high costs of imported magnet has led to restricted use of magnets in developing countries. Indigenously developed dental magnets can reduce the cost and make them affordable to our native population. The abutment-friendly benefits of magnetic attachment will help retain the removable prostheses effectively.

How to cite this article

Guttal SS, Nadiger RK. Corrosion Resistance of indigenously Fabricated Dental Magnets for Application in Prosthodontics. Int J Prosthodont Restor Dent 2017;7(2):48-52.


  1. Magnets– myths and magic. Trends Tech Contemp Dent Lab 1988 Apr;5(3):42-47.
  2. Magnetic force in orthodontics. Am J Orthod 1978 Oct;74(4):435-443.
  3. Micromagnetic retainers: an attractive solution to fixed retention. Br J Orthod 1991 May;18(2):139-141.
  4. Overdentures in general practice. Part 5— the use of copings and attachments. Br Dent J 1983 Jul;155(1):9-13.
  5. The corrosion and oxidation of Nd-Fe-B magnets. J Appl Phys 1990;67(9): 4613.
  6. Corrosion of NdFeB permanent magnet materials. J Appl Phys 1991;70(10): 6609.
  7. Corrosion characteristics of RE-Fe-B permanent magnets. J Appl Phys 1987;61(8):3766.
  8. Improved corrosion resistance of Nd-Fe-B magnets. J Mater Eng 1991 Sep;13(3):175-182.
  9. Oxidation behavior of Nd-Fe-B magnets. J Appl Phys 1987;61(8):3763-3765.
  10. Effect of oxygen on magnetic properties of Nd-Fe-B magnets. J Appl Phys 1988;64(10):5571-5573.
  11. Improvement of the corrosion resistance on Nd-Fe-B magnet with nickel plating. IEEE Trans Magn 1989 Sep;25(5):3776-3778.
  12. Magnetverankerungen auf implanten Teil 1: Bestandesaufnahme. Quintessenz 1993;44:579-588.
  13. Corrosion of intra-oral magnets in the presence and absence of biofilms of Streptococcus Sanguis. Biomaterials 1995 Jun;16(9):721-725.
  14. The effects of sodium fluoride and stannous fluoride on the surface roughness of intraoral magnet systems. J Prosthet Dent 1991 Oct;66(4):553-558.
  15. Magnetic strength and corrosion of rare earth magnets. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 2006 Sep;130(3):275-279.
  16. Corrosion resistance of iron-platinum magnets. J Dent 2004 Aug;32(6):423-429.
  17. Magnetic force systems in orthodontics. Am J Orthod 1985 Mar;87(3):202-210.
  18. The reaction of dental tissues to magnetic fields. Aust Dent J 1980 Oct;25(5):264-268.
  19. Orthodontic rare earth magnets–in vitro assessment of cytotoxicity. Br J Orthod 1994 Nov;21(4):335-341.
PDF Share
PDF Share

© Jaypee Brothers Medical Publishers (P) LTD.