International Journal of Prosthodontics and Restorative Dentistry

Register      Login

VOLUME 9 , ISSUE 2 ( April-June, 2019 ) > List of Articles

Original Article

Effect of Incorporation of an Antimicrobial Monomer 2-tert-Butylaminoethyl Methacrylate on the Flexural Strength and Impact Strength of a Heat-polymerized Acrylic Resin: An In Vitro Study

Bhumika Sharma, Prabal Sharma

Keywords : Custom-made metal molds, Denture base, Drawback, Microorganisms, Success

Citation Information : Sharma B, Sharma P. Effect of Incorporation of an Antimicrobial Monomer 2-tert-Butylaminoethyl Methacrylate on the Flexural Strength and Impact Strength of a Heat-polymerized Acrylic Resin: An In Vitro Study. Int J Prosthodont Restor Dent 2019; 9 (2):47-50.

DOI: 10.5005/jp-journals-10019-1233

License: CC BY-NC 4.0

Published Online: 01-06-2019

Copyright Statement:  Copyright © 2019; Jaypee Brothers Medical Publishers (P) Ltd.


Abstract

Aim: To evaluate the effect of incorporation of 2-tert-butylaminoethyl methacrylate (TBAEMA) on the flexural strength and impact strength of a heat-polymerized acrylic resin. Materials and methods: A total number of 240 specimens were fabricated, 120 each for flexural strength and impact strength. Further, four groups were divided according to the concentration of TBAEMA incorporated to the acrylic resin (DPI): 0%, 0.5%, 1% and 2%. Flexural strength and impact strength of the specimens was tested and results were analyzed by ANOVA and Tukey\'s test (p value ≤ 0.05). Results: Significant difference was found for both flexural strength and impact strength (p value ≤ 0.05). Conclusion: Within the limitations of this study, it was concluded that the flexural strength and impact strength gets altered, depending on the concentration of TBAEMA.


PDF Share
  1. Peyton FA. History of resins in dentistry. Dent Clin North Am 1975;19(2):211–222.
  2. Rodriguez LS, Paleari AG, et al. Chemical Characterization and Flexural Strength of a Denture Base Acrylic Resin with Monomer 2-Tert- Butylaminoethyl Methacrylate. J Prosthodont 2013;22(4):292–297. DOI: 10.1111/j.1532-849X.2012.00942.x.
  3. Regis RR, Zanini AP, et al. Physical Properties of an Acrylic Resin after Incorporation of an Antimicrobial Monomer. J Prosthodont 2011; 20(5):372–379. DOI: 10.1111/j.1532-849X.2011.00719.x.
  4. Raj N, D'Souza M. Comparison of Transverse Strength of Denture Base Resin on Immersion for Varying Time Period in Water and Denture Cleansers - An In Vitro Study. Asian J Oral Health & Allied Sci 2011;1(2):56–67.
  5. Azeez ZA, Fatah NA. The effect of incorporation of prepared Ag–Zn Zeolite on some properties of heat polymerized acrylic denture base materials. J Bagh College Dentistry 2015;27(1):63–69. DOI: 10.12816/0015266.
  6. de Castro DT, Valente MLC, et al. In vitro study of the antibacterial properties and impact strength of dental acrylic resins modified with a nanomaterial. J Prosthet Dent 2015;6:1–8.
  7. Pesci-Bardon C, Fosse T, et al. In vitro antiseptic properties of an ammonium compound combined with denture base acrylic resin. Gerodontology 2006;23(2):111–116. DOI: 10.1111/j.1741-2358.2006.00088.x.
  8. Paleari AG, Marra J, et al. Effect of incorporation of 2-tert- butylaminoethyl methacrylate on flexural strength of a denture base acrylic resin. J Appl Oral Sci 2011;19(3):195–199. DOI: 10.1590/S1678-77572011000300003.
  9. Dhir G, Berzins DW, et al. Physical properties of denture base resins potentially resistant to Candida adhesion. J Prosthodont 2007;16(6): 465–472. DOI: 10.1111/j.1532-849X.2007.00219.x.
  10. Shibata T, Hamada N, et al. Antifungal effect of acrylic resin containing Apatite-coated TiO2 photocatalyst. Dent Mater J 2007;26(3):437–444. DOI: 10.4012/dmj.26.437.
  11. Asopa V, Suresh S, et al. A comparative evaluation of properties of zirconia reinforced high impact acrylic resin with that of high impact acrylic resin. Saudi J Dent Res 2015;6(2):146–151. DOI: 10.1016/j.sjdr.2015.02.003.
  12. Abdallah RM. Evaluation of polymethyl methacrylate resin mechanical properties with incorporated halloysite nanotubes. J Adv Prosthodont 2016;8(3):167–171. DOI: 10.4047/jap.2016.8.3.167.
  13. Jagger RG. Effect of the curing cycle on some properties of a polymethylmethacrylate denture base material. J Oral Rehabil 1978;5(2):151–157. DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2842.1978.tb01208.x.
PDF Share
PDF Share

© Jaypee Brothers Medical Publishers (P) LTD.