International Journal of Prosthodontics and Restorative Dentistry

Register      Login

VOLUME 7 , ISSUE 4 ( October-December, 2017 ) > List of Articles

RESEARCH ARTICLE

Interoperator Variability in Shade Selection using Two Shade Guides

Trupti M Dahane, Ritika Gupta, Surekha Raghunath Godbole, Ashok J Pakhan, Anamika Shukla, Rasika Jibhkate

Citation Information : Dahane TM, Gupta R, Godbole SR, Pakhan AJ, Shukla A, Jibhkate R. Interoperator Variability in Shade Selection using Two Shade Guides. Int J Prosthodont Restor Dent 2017; 7 (4):124-128.

DOI: 10.5005/jp-journals-10019-1190

License: CC BY 3.0

Published Online: 01-12-2017

Copyright Statement:  Copyright © 2017; Jaypee Brothers Medical Publishers (P) Ltd.


Abstract

Statement of problem

Research shows that correct shade matching for porcelain restoration cannot be achieved accurately even after using visual shade guides because there is always a noted difference in the visual perception of operators.

Purpose

This study was conducted to compare the interoperator variability in shade selection by visual techniques using VITA Toothguide 3D-Master and Vitapan classical shade guide and then to calculate the amount of percentage in variability in shade selection.

Materials and methods

Three prosthodontists selected the shade of upper right central incisor of 100 patients (age 20—30 years) in a standardized environment. Two shade guides were used—Vitapan classical shade guide and the VITA Toothguide 3D-Master (Vita Zahnfabrik) for shade selection. Each examiner was tested to eliminate color blindness.

All teeth were polished before each shade selection, and the selection process was standardized for controlled lighting and procedures. The results were analyzed for repeatability using agreement analysis test, t-test (p = 0.05).

Results

According to the agreement analysis, there was about 14% of interperson variability seen in Vitapan classical shade guide and about 23% in VITA Toothguide 3D-Master.

Conclusion

Within the limitations of this study, the following result was drawn: VITA Toothguide 3D-Master showed higher interperson variability than Vitapan classical shade guide.

How to cite this article

Dahane TM, Gupta R, Godbole SR, Pakhan AJ, Sathe S, Shukla A, Jibhkate R. Interoperator Variability in Shade Selection using Two Shade Guides. Int J Prosthodont Restor Dent 2017;7(4):124-128.


  1. Color: implications in dentistry. J Conserv Dent 2010 Oct-Dec;13(4):249-255.
  2. A study of dental color matching, color selection and color reproduction. Siena: University of Siena; 2009.
  3. Problems in standard shade matching and reproduction procedure in dentistry. UDC 1997 May;4(1):12-16.
  4. Interoperator variability in shade matching for restoration with two shade guides. IJCD 2011 Jan;2(1).
  5. Color, light and shade matching. J Prosthet Dent 1972 Mar;27(3):263-268.
  6. Coverage error of three conceptually different shade guide systems to vital unrestored dentition. J Prosthet Dent 2007 Sep;98(3):175-185.
  7. A comparative study of shade-matching procedures. J Prosthet Dent 1970 Aug;24(2):166-173.
  8. Shade selection. Aust Dent Pract 2007 Sep-Oct;10:116-119.
  9. The influence of some different factors on the accuracy of shade selection. J Oral Rehabil 2004 Sep;31(9):900-904.
  10. Evaluating factors that affect the shade matching ability of dentists, dental staff members and lay people. J Am Dent Assoc 2010 Jan;141(1):71-76.
  11. Shade matching in restorative dentistry: the science and strategies. Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent 2003 Oct;23(5):467-479.
  12. Glossary of prosthodontic terms. 8th ed.
  13. Tooth colour selection: the application of colour science to dental colour matching. Aust Prosthodont J 1991 Feb;5:41-46.
  14. Tooth colour: a review of the literature. J Dent 2004 Feb;32(Suppl 1):3-12.
  15. Conventional versus spectrophotometric shade taking for the upper central incisor: a clinical comparative study. TMJ 2010 Nov;60(4):274-279.
  16. Reliability of two color selection devices in matching and measuring tooth color. J Contemp Dent Pract 2011 Jan-Feb;12(1):19-23.
PDF Share
PDF Share

© Jaypee Brothers Medical Publishers (P) LTD.