International Journal of Prosthodontics and Restorative Dentistry

Register      Login

SEARCH WITHIN CONTENT

FIND ARTICLE

Volume / Issue

Online First

Archive
Volume  14 (2024)
Volume  13 (2023)
Volume  12 (2022)
Volume  11 (2021)
Volume  10 (2020)
Volume  9 (2019)
Volume  8 (2018)
Volume  7 (2017)
Volume  6 (2016)
Volume  5 (2015)
Volume  4 (2014)
Volume  3 (2013)
Volume  2 (2012)
Volume  1 (2011)
Related articles

VOLUME 6 , ISSUE 4 ( October-December, 2016 ) > List of Articles

RESEARCH ARTICLE

Gingival Biotype in the Maxillary Esthetic Zone: A Pilot Study comparing Three Noninvasive Assessment Methods

Sunil K Nettemu, Sowmya Nettem, Bryan J Paulose, Vi V How, Vijendra P Singh

Citation Information : Nettemu SK, Nettem S, Paulose BJ, How VV, Singh VP. Gingival Biotype in the Maxillary Esthetic Zone: A Pilot Study comparing Three Noninvasive Assessment Methods. Int J Prosthodont Restor Dent 2016; 6 (4):85-88.

DOI: 10.5005/jp-journals-10019-1162

Published Online: 01-08-2011

Copyright Statement:  Copyright © 2016; The Author(s).


Abstract

How to cite this article

Nettemu SK, Nettem S, Paulose BJ, How VV, Singh VP. Gingival Biotype in the Maxillary Esthetic Zone: A Pilot Study comparing Three Noninvasive Assessment Methods. Int J Prosthodont Restor Dent 2016;6(4):85-88.

PDF Share
  1. Predictable single-tooth peri-implant esthetics: five diagnostic keys. Compend Contin Educ Dent 2004 Nov;25(11):895-896, 898,900.
  2. Thick vs. thin gingival biotypes: a key determinant in treatment planning for dental implants. J Calif Dent Assoc 2008 Mar;36(3):193-198.
  3. Periodontal characteristics in individuals with varying form of the upper central incisors. J Clin Periodontol 1991 Jan;18(1):78-82.
  4. The gingival biotype revisited: transparency of the periodontal probe through the gingival margin as a method to discriminate thin from thick gingiva. J Clin Periodontol 2009 May;36(5):428-433.
  5. Gingival thickness in guided tissue regeneration and associated recession at facial furcation defects. J Periodontol 1995 May;66(5):397-402.
  6. Coronally advanced flap procedure for root coverage. Is flap thickness a relevant predictor to achieve root coverage? A 19-case series. J Periodontol 1999 Sep;70(9):1077-1084.
  7. The “puffed cheek method” to evaluate mucosal thickness: case series. Clin Oral Implants Res 2013 Jul;24(7):719-724.
  8. Gingival biotype assessment in the esthetic zone: visual versus direct measurement. Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent 2010 Jun;30(3):237-243.
  9. Soft tissue cone-beam computed tomography: a novel method for the measurement of gingival tissue and the dimensions of the dentogingival unit. J Esthet Restor Dent 2008 Dec;20(6):366-374.
  10. Transgingival probing as a potential estimator of alveolar bone level. J Periodontol 1976 Sep;47(9):514-517.
  11. Factors affecting the outcomes of coronally advanced flap root coverage procedure. J Periodontol 2005 Oct;76(10):1729-1734.
  12. Flap thickness as a predictor of root coverage: a systematic review. J Periodontol 2006 Oct;77(10):1625-1634.
  13. Dimensions of peri-implant mucosa: an evaluation of maxillary anterior single implants in humans. J Periodontol 2003 Apr;74(4):557-562.
  14. Immediate placement and restoration of implants in the aesthetic zone with a trimodal approach: soft tissue alterations and its relation to gingival biotype. Clin Oral Implants Res 2013 Oct;24(10):1094-1100.
  15. Tissue biotype and its relation to the underlying bone morphology. J Periodontol 2010 Apr;81(4):569-574.
  16. The gingival biotype assessed by experienced and inexperienced clinicians. J Clin Periodontol 2009 Nov;36(11):958-963.
PDF Share
PDF Share

© Jaypee Brothers Medical Publishers (P) LTD.