International Journal of Prosthodontics and Restorative Dentistry

Register      Login

VOLUME 5 , ISSUE 4 ( October-December, 2015 ) > List of Articles


Comparison of Different Methods of Prosthetic Rehabilitation in Anterior Region

Antonio crispino, Gaetano Pisano, Leonzio Fortunato

Citation Information : crispino A, Pisano G, Fortunato L. Comparison of Different Methods of Prosthetic Rehabilitation in Anterior Region. Int J Prosthodont Restor Dent 2015; 5 (4):110-113.

DOI: 10.5005/jp-journals-10019-1140

Published Online: 01-12-2015

Copyright Statement:  Copyright © 2015; The Author(s).


Scope of work

The purpose of this work is the analysis and comparison of the various methods available for the realization of fixed restorations on natural teeth in the anterior sector with the presentation of some case report series.

Materials and methods

The methods used in relation to the clinical case, are the metal-ceramic, the galvan-ceramic, all- ceramic and porcelain veneers.


It highlights indications and limitations of each of the methods proposed, emphasizing the prominent role of esthetics in the rehabilitation sector of the front.


The materials and techniques available, with proper clinical evaluation and to a timely therapeutic planning, are the basis of the rehabilitative ideal choice for each individual case, and they also depend on the achievement of clinical success.

How to cite this article

Crispino A, Pisano G, Fortunato L. Comparison of Different Methods of Prosthetic Rehabilitation in Anterior Region. Int J Prosthodont Restor Dent 2015;5(4):110-113.

PDF Share
  1. All-ceramic or metal-ceramic tooth-supported fixed dental prostheses? A systematic review of the survival and complication rates-part I: single crowns. Dent Mater 2015 Jun;31(6):603-623.
  2. The clinical performance of porcelain-fused- to-metal precious alloy single crowns: chipping, recurrent caries, periodontitis, and loss of retention. Int J Prosthodont 2014 Mar-Apr;27(2):153-160.
  3. The effects of post-core and crown material and luting agents on stress distribution in tooth restorations. J Prosthet Dent 2014 Aug;112(2):211-219.
  4. Clinical evaluation of fractured metal-ceramic fixed dental prostheses repaired with indirect technique. Quintessence Int 2015 Mar;46(3):229-236.
  5. ceramo-metal crown or cad-cam rehabilitation: patient and practitioner appraisal. Eur J Prosthodont Restor Dent 2014 Dec;22(4):159-165.
  6. Loading capacity of zirconia implant supported hybrid ceramic crowns. Dent Mater 2015 Oct 9. pii: S0109-5641(15)00408-X.
  7. Selective laser melting technique of Co-Cr dental alloys: a review of structure and properties and comparative analysis with other available techniques. J Prosthodont 2015 Jun;24(4):303-312.
  8. Restoration longevity versus esthetics: a dilemma for dentists and patients. J Am Dent Assoc 2011 Oct;142(10):1194-6.
  9. Factors essential for successful all-ceramic restorations. J Am Dent Assoc 2008 Sep;139(Suppl):14S-18S.
  10. Assessment of exposures and potential risks to the US adult population from the leaching of elements from gold and ceramic dental restorations. J Expo Sci Environ Epidemiol 2015 Sep 16.
  11. Two-body wear comparison of zirconia crown, gold crown, and enamel against zirconia. J Mech Behav Biomed Mater 2015 Jul;47:21-28.
PDF Share
PDF Share

© Jaypee Brothers Medical Publishers (P) LTD.