International Journal of Prosthodontics and Restorative Dentistry

Register      Login

VOLUME 5 , ISSUE 3 ( July-September, 2015 ) > List of Articles

RESEARCH ARTICLE

Varying Perception of Smile Esthetics-A Deviation from the Norm: A Pictorial Questionnaire-based Survey

Sneha Ketan Gada

Citation Information : Gada SK. Varying Perception of Smile Esthetics-A Deviation from the Norm: A Pictorial Questionnaire-based Survey. Int J Prosthodont Restor Dent 2015; 5 (3):68-73.

DOI: 10.5005/jp-journals-10019-1133

Published Online: 01-09-2015

Copyright Statement:  Copyright © 2015; Jaypee Brothers Medical Publishers (P) Ltd.


Abstract

Introduction

Living in a beauty conscious society, the mouth, a focal point of the face, plays a major role in how we perceive ourselves and in the impression we make on the people around us.

Esthetic perception varies from person to person, being influenced by each person's personal experience and social environment. In the process of providing esthetic treatment for a patient, one should not only rely on one's eyes and personal perception of beauty, but also be guided by the patient's desires. Hence, the measurement of the perception of beauty in dentistry is fundamental for providing scientific data that can guide diagnosis and treatment planning.

Aim

This study aims at evaluating the changing trends of esthetic dentistry with the perception of people.

Materials and methods

The study using a visual pictorial questionnaire was conducted among 100 students of Nair Hospital Dental College, Mumbai, Maharashtra, India in February 2013, consequently repeated in October 2013. The scores were averaged and calculated to record the probability prevalence of the same.

Results

A marked shift from the conventional principles of smiles design has been witnessed showing a changing perception of people contrasting to the esthetic norms.

Conclusion

An equal importance needs to be given to the patient's desire combined with the dentist's knowledge and experience of esthetics to deliver efficient and appreciable esthetic outcomes.

How to cite this article

Gada SK, Gupta P. Varying Perception of Smile Esthetics-A Deviation from the Norm: A Pictorial Questionnaire-based Survey. Int J Prosthodont Restor Dent 2015;5(3):68-73.


PDF Share
  1. Facing It. Change Your Smile: Discover how a new smile can transform your life. 4th ed. Quintessence Publishing Co, Inc; 2009.
  2. Macroesthetic elements of smile design. J Am Dent Assoc 2001 Jan;132(1):39-45.
  3. The impact of dental appearance on the appraisal of personal characterisctics. Int J Prosthodont 2003;16(4);429-434.
  4. A Morphometric analysis of the posed smile. Clin Orthod Res 1998;1(1):2-11.
  5. Perceptions of patient's smiles: a comparison of patient's and dentist's opinions. J Am Dent Assoc 2007 Dec;138(12):1544-1553.
  6. Assessment of the perception of smile esthetics by laypersons, dental students and dental practitioners. Int Orthod 2013 Dec;11(4):432-444.
  7. Perception of personal dental appearance in young adults: relationship between occlusion, awareness, and satisfaction. Am J Orthodont Dentofac Orthoped 1991 Sept;100(3):234-241.
  8. Factors influencing the desire for orthodontic treatment. Eur J Orthod 1981;3(3):151-162.
  9. Dental esthetic satisfaction in adults. J Am Dent Assoc 1989 May;118(5):565-570.
  10. Perception of smile esthetics among Indian dental professional and layperson. IJDR 2012;23(2):295.
  11. Perception of desirable tooth color among parents, dentists and children. JADA 2004;135(5):595-604.
  12. Perception of Malocclusion. Br Dent J 1975 Mar 18;138(6):211-216.
  13. Comparing the perception of dentists and lay people to altered dental esthetics. J Esthet Dent 1999;11(6):311-324.
  14. Perception of dental attractiveness and friend selection in school children. Am J Orthod 1978; 74:686-687.
  15. The influence of children's dentofacial appearance on the social attractiveness as judged by peers and lay adults. Am J Orthod 1981 Apr;79(4):399-415.
  16. The influence of incisal malocclusion on the social attractiveness of young adults in Finland. Eur J Orthod 1995;17(6):505-512.
  17. The impact of dental appearance on perceptions of personal characteristics among Chinese people in the United Kingdom. Int Dent J 2001;51(4):282-286.
  18. At First glance: social meanings of dental appearance. J Public Health Dent 2001;61(3): 150-154.
  19. Unity and variety; essential ingredient of a smile design. Curr Opin Cosmet Dent 1994;1-5.
  20. Dental aesthetics-a survey of attitudes in different groups of patients. J Dentist 1996;24(5):335-338.
  21. Tooth shade preference in older patients. Gerodontics 1985;1:130-133.
  22. Objective and subjective whitening response of two self-directed bleaching systems. Am J Dentist 2002;15:Spec No. 7A-12A.
  23. A randomized clinical trial comparing a novel 5.3% hydrogen peroxide whitening strip to 10%, 15%, and 20% carbamide peroxide tray-based bleaching systems. Compendium of Continuing Education in Dentistry 2000;29:S22-S28.
  24. Esthetic perception towards different combinations of facial contours and upper incisor shape. Braz J Oral Sci 2009 Oct/Dec;8(4):193-196.
  25. Perceptions of dental professionals and laypersons to altered dental esthetics: asymmetric and symmetric situations. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 2006 Aug;130(2):141-151.
  26. The kinetics of anterior tooth display. J Prosthet Dent 1978;39(5):502-504.
  27. The dysesthetic interpretation of the dentogenic concept. J Prosthet Dent 1958;8:558-581.
  28. Am J Orthodont Dentofac Orthoped 2005;127(2):208-213.
  29. The importance of incisor positioning in the esthetic smile: the smile arc. Am J Orthod Dentofac Orthrop 2001;120(2):98-111.
PDF Share
PDF Share

© Jaypee Brothers Medical Publishers (P) LTD.