International Journal of Prosthodontics and Restorative Dentistry

Register      Login

SEARCH WITHIN CONTENT

FIND ARTICLE

Volume / Issue

Online First

Archive
Volume  14 (2024)
Volume  13 (2023)
Volume  12 (2022)
Volume  11 (2021)
Volume  10 (2020)
Volume  9 (2019)
Volume  8 (2018)
Volume  7 (2017)
Volume  6 (2016)
Volume  5 (2015)
Volume  4 (2014)
Volume  3 (2013)
Volume  2 (2012)
Volume  1 (2011)
Related articles

VOLUME 12 , ISSUE 3 ( July-September, 2022 ) > List of Articles

ORIGINAL RESEARCH

Comparative Evaluation of the Shear Bond Strength of MTA and Biodentine to Different Permanent Restorative Materials: An In Vitro Study

Jesseca John, VP Prabath Singh

Keywords : Amalgomer, Biodentine, Mineral trioxide aggregate, Nanocomposite, Resin-modified glass ionomer cements, Shear bond strength

Citation Information : John J, Singh VP. Comparative Evaluation of the Shear Bond Strength of MTA and Biodentine to Different Permanent Restorative Materials: An In Vitro Study. Int J Prosthodont Restor Dent 2022; 12 (3):118-124.

DOI: 10.5005/jp-journals-10019-1379

License: CC BY-NC 4.0

Published Online: 30-03-2023

Copyright Statement:  Copyright © 2022; The Author(s).


Abstract

Purpose: The purpose of the study was to compare the shear bond strength (SBS) and, failure modes of mineral trioxide aggregate (MTA), and biodentine to nanocomposite, ceramic-reinforced glass ionomer (Amalgomer CR), and resin-modified glass ionomer cements (RMGIC). Materials and methods: Acrylic blocks were employed as a platform to place the cements and restorative materials. In the present study, 30 acrylic blocks were prepared and divided into two groups (n = 15 each), MTA and biodentine. The acrylic blocks were allocated into three subgroups (n = 5 each) based on the restorative material used (nanocomposite, Amalgomer CR, and RMGIC). The specimens were mounted in the universal testing machine to evaluate the SBS. Failure modes of each group were evaluated under a stereomicroscope. Kruskal–Wallis test was done to find the statistical significance of SBS among the three different materials in each group. In the case of statistical significance, the Dunn Bonferroni multiple comparison test was used to identify the significant pair of groups. Results: In the MTA group, MTA + nanocomposite showed the highest bond strength (7.77 MPa) and in the biodentine group, biodentine + nanocomposite showed the highest bond strength (9 MPa). The multiple comparison test showed a significant statistical difference in the SBS in the MTA group (p = 0.005). SBS among the three different materials with biodentine showed statistical insignificance (p = 0.153). Conclusion: The bonding of MTA and biodentine to the overlying restoration is affected by choice of the restorative material. In a clinical scenario, nanocomposite should be the preferred restorative material with both MTA and biodentine.

HTML PDF Share
  1. Hashem DF, Foxton R, Manoharan A, et al. The physical characteristics of resin composite-calcium silicate interface as part of a layered/laminate adhesive restoration. Dent Mater 2014;30(3):343–349. DOI: 10.1016/j.dental.2013.12.010
  2. Altunsoy M, Tanrıver M, Ok E, et al. Shear bond strength of a self-adhering flowable composite and a flowable base composite to mineral trioxide aggregate, calcium-enriched mixture cement, and biodentine. J Endod 2015;41(10):1691–1695. DOI: 10.1016/j.joen.2015.06.013
  3. Oskoee SS, Kimyai S, Bahari M, et al. Comparison of shear bond strength of calcium-enriched mixture cement and mineral trioxide aggregate to composite resin. J Contemp Dent Pract 2011;12(6):457–462. DOI: 10.5005/jp-journals-10024-1076
  4. Shin JH, Jang JH, Park SH, et al. Effect of mineral trioxide aggregate surface treatments on morphology and bond strength to composite resin. J Endod 2014;40(8):1210–1216. DOI: 10.1016/j.joen.2014.01.027
  5. Hursh KA, Kirkpatrick TC, Cardon JW, et al. Shear bond comparison between 4 bioceramic materials and dual-cure composite resin. J Endod 2019;45(11):1378–1383. DOI: 10.1016/j.joen.2019.07.008
  6. Mahmoud SH, El-Negoly SA, Zaen El-Din AM, et al. Biodentine versus mineral trioxide aggregate as a direct pulp capping material for human mature permanent teeth - a systematic review. J Conserv Dent 2018;21(5):466–473. DOI: 10.4103/JCD.JCD_198_18
  7. Parirokh M, Torabinejad M. Mineral trioxide aggregate: a comprehensive literature review–Part I: chemical, physical, and antibacterial properties. J Endod 2010;36(1):16–27. DOI: 10.1016/j.joen.2009.09.006
  8. Laurent P, Camps J, About I. Biodentine(TM) induces TGF-β1 release from human pulp cells and early dental pulp mineralization. Int Endod J 2012;45(5):439–448. DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2591.2011.01995.x
  9. Mitra SB, Wu D, Holmes BN. An application of nanotechnology in advanced dental materials. J Am Dent Assoc 2003;134(10):1382–1390. DOI: 10.14219/jada.archive.2003.0054
  10. Deepa G, Shobha T. A clinical evaluation of two glass ionomer cements in primary molars using atraumatic restorative treatment technique in India: 1 year follow up. Int J Paediatr Dent 2010;20(6):410–418. DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-263X.2010.01067.x
  11. Ayad NM, Elnogoly SA, Abouelatta OM. An in-vitro study of the physico-mechanical properties of a new esthetic restorative versus dental amalgam. J Dent Res Dent 2008;4(3):137–144.
  12. Napte BD, Raghavendra SS. Evaluation of shear bond strength of conventional glass ionomer cements bonded to mineral trioxide aggregate: an in vitro study. J Dent Allied Sci 2015;4(2):73–77. DOI: 10.4103/2277-4696.171519
  13. Leloup G, D'Hoore W, Bouter D, et al. Meta-analytical review of factors involved in dentin adherence. J Dent Res 2001;80(7):1605–1614. DOI: 10.1177/00220345010800070301
  14. Sudsangiam S, van Noort R. Do dentin bond strength tests serve a useful purpose? J Adhes Dent 1999;1(1):57–67.
  15. Frankenberger R, Krämer N, Lohbauer U, et al. Marginal integrity: is the clinical performance of bonded restorations predictable in vitro? J Adhes Dent 2007;9(Suppl 1):107–116.
  16. Neelakantan P, Grotra D, Subbarao CV, et al. The shear bond strength of resin-based composite to white mineral trioxide aggregate. J Am Dent Assoc 2012;143(8):e40–e45. DOI: 10.14219/jada.archive.2012.0302
  17. Sambathkumar PA, Mathian VM, Princy P, et al. Comparative evaluation of shear bond strength of biodentine and resin modified glass ionomer cement using two adhesive systems in premolars restored with composites: an in – vitro study. IOSR J Dent Med Sci 2019;18(4):08–13. DOI: 10.9790/0853-1804050813
  18. Cantekin K, Avci S. Evaluation of shear bond strength of two resin-based composites and glass ionomer cement to pure tricalcium silicate-based cement (Biodentine®). J Appl Oral Sci 2014;22(4):302–306. DOI: 10.1590/1678-775720130660
  19. Odabaş ME, Bani M, Tirali RE. Shear bond strengths of different adhesive systems to biodentine. ScientificWorldJournal 2013;2013:1–5. DOI: 10.1155/2013/626103
  20. Çolak H, Tokay U, Uzgur R, et al. The effect of different adhesives and setting times on bond strength between biodentine and composite. J Appl Biomater Funct Mater 2016;14(2):e217–e222. DOI: 10.5301/jabfm.5000266
  21. Meraji N, Camilleri J. Bonding over dentin replacement materials. J Endod 2017;43(8):1343–1349. DOI: 10.1016/j.joen.2017.03.025
  22. Jantarat J, Ritsayam S, Banomyong D, et al. Early and 24-hour shear bond strength to dentine of three calcium silicate based pulp capping materials. M Dent J 2018;38(2):177–183.
  23. Vanderweele RA, Schwartz SA, Beeson TJ. Effect of blood contamination on retention characteristics of MTA when mixed with different liquids. J Endod 2006;32(5):421–424. DOI: 10.1016/j.joen.2005.09.007
  24. Kayahan MB, Nekoofar MH, Kazandağ M, et al. Effect of acid-etching procedure on selected physical properties of mineral trioxide aggregate. Int Endod J 2009;42(11):1004–1014. DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2591.2009.01610.x
  25. Bachoo IK, Seymour D, Brunton P. A biocompatible and bioactive replacement for dentine: is this a reality? The properties and uses of a novel calcium-based cement. Br Dent J 2013;214(2):E5. DOI: 10.1038/sj.bdj.2013.57
  26. Kaup M, Dammann CH, Schäfer E, et al. Shear bond strength of biodentine, ProRoot MTA, glass ionomer cement and composite resin on human dentine ex vivo. Head Face Med 2015;11:14. DOI: 10.1186/s13005-015-0071-z
  27. Aksoy S, Ünal M. Shear bond strength of universal adhesive systems to a bioactive dentin substitute (Biodentine®) at different time intervals. Stomatological Dis Sci 2017;1:116–122. DOI: 10.20517/2573-0002.2017.07
  28. Ajami AA, Jafari Navimipour E, Savadi Oskoee S, et al. Comparison of shear bond strength of resin-modified glass ionomer and composite resin to three pulp capping agents. J Dent Res Dent Clin Dent Prospects 2013;7(3):164–168. DOI: 10.5681/joddd.2013.026
  29. Tulumbaci F, Almaz ME, Arikan V, et al. Shear bond strength of different restorative materials to mineral trioxide aggregate and biodentine. J Conserv Dent JCD. 2017;20(5):292–296. DOI: 10.4103/JCD.JCD_97_17
  30. Tunç ES, Sönmez IS, Bayrak S, et al. The evaluation of bond strength of a composite and a compomer to white mineral trioxide aggregate with two different bonding systems. J Endod 2008;34(5):603–605. DOI: 10.1016/j.joen.2008.02.026
  31. Yelamali S, Patil AC. Evaluation of shear bond strength of a composite resin to white mineral trioxide aggregate with three different bonding systems-an in vitro analysis. J Clin Exp Dent 2016;8(3):e273–277. DOI: 10.4317/jced.52727
  32. Deepa VL, Dhamaraju B, Bollu IP, et al. Shear bond strength evaluation of resin composite bonded to three different liners: TheraCal LC, Biodentine, and resin-modified glass ionomer cement using universal adhesive: An in vitro study. J Conserv Dent 2016;19(2):166–170. DOI: 10.4103/0972-0707.178696
  33. Pradeep PS, Randhya R, Palliyal S, et al. An in vitro comparative evaluation of shear bond strength of biodentine and MTA. Int J Appl Dent Sci 2018;4(2):01–03.
  34. Ajami AA, Bahari M, Hassanpour-Kashani A, et al. Shear bond strengths of composite resin and giomer to mineral trioxide aggregate at different time intervals. J Clin Exp Dent 2017;9(7):e906–e911. DOI: 10.4317/jced.53791
  35. Meharwade P, Parameshwarappa P, Kenchappa M, et al. Evaluation of the shear bond strength of methacrylate-based composite, resin-modified glass ionomer cement, and Fuji IX glass ionomer cement with biodentine as a base. CODS J Dent 2020;11(2):40–43. DOI: 10.5005/jp-journals-10063-0050
PDF Share
PDF Share

© Jaypee Brothers Medical Publishers (P) LTD.