International Journal of Prosthodontics and Restorative Dentistry

Register      Login

VOLUME 12 , ISSUE 2 ( April-June, 2022 ) > List of Articles


Stress Distribution in Multiple Single Piece Dental Implant Following Syncrystallization- A Finite Element Analysis

Subachander Prabhakaran, Annapoorni Hariharan

Keywords : Finite element analysis, Immediate loading, Single piece implants, Stress distribution, Syncrystallization

Citation Information : Prabhakaran S, Hariharan A. Stress Distribution in Multiple Single Piece Dental Implant Following Syncrystallization- A Finite Element Analysis. Int J Prosthodont Restor Dent 2022; 12 (2):64-69.

DOI: 10.5005/jp-journals-10019-1362

License: CC BY-NC 4.0

Published Online: 25-01-2023

Copyright Statement:  Copyright © 2022; The Author(s).


Purpose: The purpose of this article was to evaluate and analyze the stress distribution in multiple single-piece dental implants before and after syncrystallization using finite element models. Materials and methods: Two maxillary three-dimensional (3D) finite element models were constructed using Creo elements software, with each model consisting of eight single-piece implants. Implants were positioned in the central incisor, canine, second premolar, and second molar regions, respectively, in both quadrants. In model A, no syncrystallization was done, and in model B, syncrystallization was done. Acrylic provisional restoration was constructed using 3D over the implants in both models A and B. Axial loading forces of 300 N in the anterior region (incisor to canine) and 800 N in the posterior region (premolar to molar) were applied using analysis of systems (ANSYS) software to analyze and compare the stress distribution between two finite element models. Results: Model B with syncrystallization showed less stress at implant, hard bone, and soft bone levels when compared to model A. A significant stress reduction of about 23% at the implant level, 47% at the hard bone level, and 42% at the soft bone level was seen. When compared at the provisional acrylic level, model B showed reduced stress compared to model A. Conclusion: Immediate loading after syncrystallization of multiple single-piece dental implants to titanium bars of sufficient thickness showed uniform and reduced stress distribution and aids in osseointegration when compared to conventional immediate loading of multiple single-piece dental implants.

PDF Share
  1. Degidi M, Gehrke P, Spanel A, et al. Syncrystallization: a technique for temporization of immediately loaded implants with metal-reinforced acrylic resin restorations. Clin Implant Dent Rel Res 2006;8(3):123–134. DOI: 10.1111/j.1708-8208.2006.00011.x
  2. Longoni S, Sartori M, Davide R. A simplified method to reduce prosthetic misfit for a screw-retained, implant-supported complete denture using a luting technique and laser welding. J Prosth Dent 2004;91(6):595–598. DOI: 10.1016/j.prosdent.2004.02.016
  3. Fornaini C, Merigo E, Cernavin I, et al. Intraoral laser welding (ILW) in implant prosthetic dentistry: case report. Case Rep Dent 2012;2012(3):839141. DOI: 10.1155/2012/839141
  4. Hruska AR. Intraoral welding of pure titanium. Quintessence Int 1987;18(10):683–688. PMID: 2890179.
  5. Degidi M, Nardi D, Piattelli A. Immediate definitive rehabilitation of the edentulous patient using an intraorally welded titanium framework: a 3-year prospective study. Quintessence Int 2010;41(8):651–659. DOI: 10.3238/ZZI.2012.0326-0338
  6. Hsu ML, Chang CL. Application of Finite Element Analysis in Dentistry. In:Moratal D, editor. Finite Element Analysis [Internet]. Sciyo; 2010 [cited 2019 Dec 10].
  7. Varga S, Spalj S, Lapter Varga M, et al. Maximum voluntary molar bite force in subjects with normal occlusion. Eur J Orthod 2011;33(4):427–433. DOI: 10.1093/ejo/cjq097
  8. Kitoh M, Matsuhsita Y, Yamaue S, et al. The stress distribution of the hydroxyapatite implant under the vertical load by the two-dimensional finite element method. J Oral Implantol 1988;14(1):65–71. PMID: 2855843.
  9. Lindquist LW, Rockler B, Carlsson GE. Bone resorption around fixtures in edentulous patients treated with mandibular fixed tissue-integrated prostheses. J Prosthet Dent 1988;59(1):59–63. DOI: 10.1016/0022-3913(88)90109-6
  10. Alberto MA, Lorenzo B, Federica P, et al. Mechanical and fatigue resistance of restorations supported by welded- framework and realized using computer-aided designed prosthetic shells: in vitro pilot study. Res Square 2022. DOI: 10.21203/
  11. Garg J, Dhawan P. Intraoral welding: a concept of immediate rehabilitation of edentulous arches-a primer. J Prosthet Implant Dent 2020;3(2):83–87.
  12. Hruska A, Borelli P, Bordanaro A, et al. Immediate loading implants: a clinical report of 1301 implants. J Oral Implantol 2002;28(4):200–209. DOI: 10.1563/1548-1336(2002)028<0200:ILIACR>2.3.CO;2
  13. Degidi M, Nardi D, Sighinolfi G, et al. In vitro infrared thermography assessment of temperature peaks during the intra-oral welding of titanium abutments. Infrared Physics Technol 2012;55(4):279–283. DOI: 10.1016/j.infrared.2012.03.010
  14. Fogli V, Camerini M, Lauritano D, et al. Success and high predictability of intraorally welded titanium bar in the immediate loading implants. Case Rep Dent 2014;2014(6):215378. DOI: 10.1155/2014/215378
  15. Koka P, Mohapatra A, Anandapandian PA, et al. The effect of implant design on the stress distribution in a three-unit implant-supported distal cantilever fixed partial denture: a three-dimensional finite-element analysis. Indian J Dent Res 2012;23(2):129–134. DOI: 10.4103/0970-9290.100413
  16. Silva GC, Mendonça JA, Lopes LR, et al. Stress patterns on implants in prostheses supported by four or six implants: a three-dimensional finite element analysis. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 2010;25(2):239–246. PMID: 20369081.
  17. Ciftçi Y, Canay S. The effect of veneering materials on stress distribution in implant-supported fixed prosthetic restorations. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 2000;15(4):571–582. ISSN: 0882–2786. PMID: 10960992.
  18. Geng JP, Tan KB, Liu GR. Application of finite element analysis in implant dentistry: a review of the literature. J Prosthet Dent 2001;85(6):585–598. DOI: 10.1067/mpr.2001.115251
  19. Ferraris S, Spriano S, Lorenzon G. Intraoral welding of titanium dental implants: characterization of the joints. J Mater Proces Technol 2016;235:85–91. DOI: 10.1016/j.jmatprotec.2016.04.018
  20. Degidi M, Nardi D, Morri A, et al. Fatigue limits of titanium-bar joints made with the laser and the electric resistance welding techniques: microstructural characterization and hardness proper ties. Proc Inst Mech Eng H 2017;231(9):839–850. DOI: 10.1177/0954411917709835
  21. Shetty M, Hegde R, N A, et al. Immediate rehabilitation of edentulous maxilla with a definitive prosthesis utilizing an intraorally welded titanium framework. RGUHS J Med Sci 2022;12(1):292–295. DOI: 10.26463/rjms.12_1_3
  22. Marchesi M, Ferrari C, Superbi S, et al. Modified protocol of the intraoral welding technique for immediate implant-supported rehabilitation of the edentulous maxilla. Implant Dent 2015;24(1):110–116. DOI: 10.1097/ID.0000000000000189
  23. Rodrigues SA, Presotto AGC, Barão VAR, et al. The role of welding techniques in the biomechanical behavior of implant-supported prostheses. Mater Sci Eng C Mater Biol Appl 2017;78:435–442. DOI: 10.1016/j.msec.2017.04.090
  24. Kurtzman GM, Tramonte SU, Dominici AD. Immediate loading with intraoral welding for improved implant stability during healing. Int J Oral ImplantolClin Res 2011;2(2):85–91. DOI: 10.5005/jp-journals-10012-1041
  25. Alper B, Gultekin P, Yalci S. Application of Finite Element Analysis in Implant Dentistry. In:Ebrahimi F, editor. Finite Element Analysis - New Trends and Developments [Internet]. InTech; 2012 [cited 2019 Dec 10].
PDF Share
PDF Share

© Jaypee Brothers Medical Publishers (P) LTD.