International Journal of Prosthodontics and Restorative Dentistry

Register      Login

VOLUME 12 , ISSUE 1 ( January-March, 2022 ) > List of Articles


Knowledge and Perceptions of Undergraduate Dental Students toward Implant Dentistry in Myanmar

Aung T Hein, Nay N Htun, Yan A Tun, Thiri Kyaw, Shwe Hlaing, Than Swe

Keywords : Dental implants, Dental students, Knowledge and perceptions, Predoctoral education, Preliminary study

Citation Information : Hein AT, Htun NN, Tun YA, Kyaw T, Hlaing S, Swe T. Knowledge and Perceptions of Undergraduate Dental Students toward Implant Dentistry in Myanmar. Int J Prosthodont Restor Dent 2022; 12 (1):11-15.

DOI: 10.5005/jp-journals-10019-1356

License: CC BY-NC 4.0

Published Online: 18-10-2022

Copyright Statement:  Copyright © 2022; The Author(s).


Purpose: The purpose of this preliminary survey is to assess the knowledge and perceptions of clinical year dental students toward dental implants and dental implant treatment. Materials and methods: This cross-sectional descriptive first survey was conducted on 3rd, 4th, and 5th (final) year undergraduate dental students from the University of Dental Medicine, Yangon, Myanmar, by using the nine-item closed-ended questionnaire (500 questionnaires) under the approval of the Research and Ethics Committee of the University in 2019. Data were analyzed by percentage frequency distribution. Results: A total of 489 students participated in this survey, with a response rate of 97.8%. Most of the students (42.54%) claimed that they had been “poorly” informed about implantology. The majority of the students (59.92%) believed that “longevity” is the main advantage of dental implants, and 31.70% thought “experience of the operator” is the most important factor for implant success. A total of 29.04% agreed that 10–20 years is the longevity of dental implants and 46.63% of the respondents concurred that dental implants need additional care procedures than natural teeth. A large majority of the respondents (63.60%) agreed dental implant treatment is “very difficult” compared to other dental procedures. Most of the students have insufficient knowledge of dental implant manufacturing and the local market situation. Around 67.28% concluded that economic feasibility would limit implant treatment in Myanmar. Conclusion: The knowledge and perceptions of clinical year dental students toward dental implantology have been recognized as deficient. Therefore, it is necessary to add more specific education programs in implant dentistry into the current undergraduate courses.

PDF Share
  1. Resnik RR, Misch's Contemporary Implant Dentistry, 4th ed, Elsevier; 2020.
  2. Mattheos N, Ivanovski S, Sambrook P, et al. Implant dentistry in Australian undergraduate dental curricula: knowledge and competencies for the graduating dentist. Aust Dent J 2010;55(3):333–338. DOI: 10.1111/j.1834-7819.2010.01246.x
  3. Chowdhary R, Mankani N, Chandraker NK. Awareness of dental implants as a treatment choice in urban Indian populations. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 2010;25(2):305–308.
  4. Pommer B, Zechner W, Watzak G, et al. Progress and trends in patients’ mindset on dental implants. I: level of information, sources of information and need for patient information. Clin Oral Implants Res 2011;22(2):223–229. DOI: 10.1111/j.1600-0501.2010.02035.x
  5. Faramarzi M, Shirmohammadi A, Chisazi MT, et al. Patient's knowledge regarding dental implants in Tabriz, Iran. Avicenna J Dent Res 2012;4(1):40–45.
  6. Chaudhary S, Gowda TM, Kumar TAB, et al. Knowledge, attitudes, and perceptions of undergraduate dental students toward dental implants-an all India survey. Implant Dent 2015;24(2):160–165. DOI: 10.1097/ID.0000000000000184
  7. Afsharzand Z, Lim MVC, Rashedi B, et al. Predoctoral implant dentistry curriculum survey: European dental schools. Eur J Dent Educ 2005;9(1):37–45. DOI: 10.1111/j.1600-0579.2004.00363.x
  8. Atashrazm P, Vallaie N, Rahnema R, et al. Worldwide predoctoral dental implant curriculum survey. J Dent 2011;8(1):12–18.
  9. Ariani N, Mursid S, Odang RW, et al. Indonesian undergraduate dental students’ perceptions toward implant treatment and education. J Investig Clin Dent 2013;4(2):107–112. DOI: 10.1111/j.2041-1626.2012.00166.x
  10. Sharma A, Shrestha B, Chaudhari BK, et al. Knowledge, awareness, and attitude regarding dental implants among dental interns. JNMA J Nepal Med Assoc 2018;56(210):607–615.
  11. Walton JN, Gardner FM, Agar JR. A survey of crown and fixed partial denture failures: length of service and reasons for replacement. J Prosthet Dent 1986;56(4):416–421. DOI: 10.1016/0022-3913(86)90379-3
  12. Schwartz NL, Whitsett LD, Berry TG, et al. Unserviceable crowns and fixed partial dentures: life-span and causes for loss of serviceability. J Am Dent Assoc 1970;81(6):1395–1401. DOI: 10.14219/jada.archive.1970.0398
  13. Abullais SS, AlQahtani NA, Kudyar N, et al. Success of dental implants: must-know prognostic factors. J Dent Implants 2016;6(1):44–48. DOI:10.4103/0974-6781.190387
  14. Goiato MC, dos Santos DM, Santiago JF Jr, et al. Longevity of dental implants in type IV bone: a systematic review. Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg 2014;43(9):1108–1116. DOI: 10.1016/j.ijom.2014.02.016
  15. Moraschini V, Poubel LA, Ferreira VF, et al. Evaluation of survival and success rates of dental implants reported in longitudinal studies with a follow-up period of at least 10 years: a systematic review. Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg 2015;44(3):377–388. DOI: 10.1016/j.ijom.2014.10.023
  16. Krebs M, Schmenger K, Neumann K, et al. Long-term evaluation of ANKYLOS® dental implants, part I: 20-year life table analysis of a longitudinal study of more than 12,500 implants. Clin Implant Dent Relat Res 2015;17(1):275–286. DOI: 10.1111/cid.12154
  17. Todescan S, Lavigne S, Kelekis-Cholakis A. Guidance for the maintenance care of dental implants: clinical review. J Can Dent Assoc 2012;78:c107.
  18. Gulati M, Govila V, Anand V, et al. Implant maintenance: a clinical update. Int Sch Res Notices 2014;2014:1–8. DOI: 10.1155/2014/908534
  19. Schweyen R, Al-Nawas B, Arnold C, et al. A cross-sectional survey of attitudes towards education in implant dentistry in the undergraduate dental curriculum. Int J Implant Dent 2020;6(1):26. DOI: 10.1186/s40729-020-00224-8
  20. Australasian Osseointegration Society (NSW) Inc. Best practice in Implant Dentistry 2007. Available from: accessed 30 September 2019.
  21. Moeini G, Ghazanfari R, Habibzadeh S, et al. Knowledge and attitude in implant dentistry training courses amongst undergraduate dental students at Tehran University of Medical Sciences. Euro J Dent Edu2022. DOI: 10.1111/eje.12815
  22. Watson RM. The teaching of osseointegrated implant dentistry in the schools of the UK and Eire. Br Dent J 1993;175(6):201–203. DOI: 10.1038/sj.bdj.4808274
  23. Chaturvedi S, Elmahdi AE, Abdelmonem AM, et al. Predoctoral dental implant education techniques-students’ perception and attitude. J Dent Edu 2021;85(3):392–400. DOI: 10.1002/jdd.12453
  24. Hare A, Bird S, Wright S, et al. Current undergraduate dental implantology teaching in UK. Dent J 2022;10(7):127. DOI: 10.3390/dj10070127
PDF Share
PDF Share

© Jaypee Brothers Medical Publishers (P) LTD.