International Journal of Prosthodontics and Restorative Dentistry

Register      Login

VOLUME 11 , ISSUE 2 ( April-June, 2021 ) > List of Articles


Implant Overdenture Attachments: Well-known Trade Names and Basic Types

Citation Information : Implant Overdenture Attachments: Well-known Trade Names and Basic Types. Int J Prosthodont Restor Dent 2021; 11 (2):68-69.

DOI: 10.5005/jp-journals-10019-1319

License: CC BY-NC 4.0

Published Online: 30-09-2021

Copyright Statement:  Copyright © 2021; The Author(s).


  1. van Waas MA. Determinants of dissatisfaction with dentures: a multiple regression analysis. J Prosthet Dent 1990;64(5):569–572. DOI: 10.1016/0022-3913(90)90130-5.
  2. Alfadda SA. The relationship between various parameters of complete denture quality and patients’ satisfaction. J Am Dent Assoc 2014;145(9):941–948. DOI: 10.14219/jada.2013.48.
  3. Feine JS, Carlsson GE, Awad MA, et al. The McGill consensus statement on overdentures. Mandibular two-implant overdentures as first choice standard of care for edentulous patients. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 2002;17(4):601–602.
  4. Das KP, Jahangiri L, Katz RV. The first-choice standard of care for an edentulous mandible: a Delphi method survey of academic prosthodontists in the United States. J Am Dent Assoc 2012;143(8):881–889. DOI: 10.14219/jada.archive.2012.0292.
  5. Prieskel HW. Telescopic prostheses. In: Preiskel HW, ed. Precision attachments in prosthodontics: overdentures and telescopic prostheses. Chicago: Quintessence Publishing Co. Inc.; 1985. vol. 2 pp. 307–328.
  6. Preiskel HW. Overdentures made easy: a guide to implant and root supported prostheses. 1st ed., Chicago, Illinois, USA: Quintessence Publishing Co. Inc.; 1996.
  7. Ahuja S, Cagna DR. Classification and management of restorative space in edentulous implant overdenture patients. J Prosthet Dent 2011;105(5):332–337. DOI: 10.1016/S0022-3913(11)60064-4.
  8. Bhargava A, Sehgal M, Gupta S, et al. Classification system on the selection of number of implants and superstructure design on the basis available vertical restorative space and interforaminal distance for implant supported mandibular overdenture. J Indian Prosthodont Soc 2016;16(2):131–135. DOI: 10.4103/0972-4052.176541.
  9. Scherer MD, McGlumphy EA, Seghi RR, et al. Comparison of retention and stability of two implant-retained overdentures based on implant location. J Prosthet Dent 2014;112(3):515–521. DOI: 10.1016/j.prosdent.2014.03.003.
  10. Hegazy SA, El Mekawy N, Emera RMK. Impact of implants number and attachment type on the peri-implant stresses and retention of palateless implant-retained overdenture. Indian J Dent Res 2020;31(3):414–419. DOI: 10.4103/ijdr.IJDR_772_18.
  11. Baskaradoss JK, Geevarghese A, Baig MR. Peri-implant mucosal response to implant-supported overdentures: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Gerodontology 2021;38(1):27–40. DOI: 10.1111/ger.12505.
  12. Cehreli MC, Karasoy D, Kökat AM, et al. A systematic review of marginal bone loss around implants retaining or supporting overdentures. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 2010;25(2):266–277.
PDF Share
PDF Share

© Jaypee Brothers Medical Publishers (P) LTD.