International Journal of Prosthodontics and Restorative Dentistry

Register      Login

VOLUME 11 , ISSUE 1 ( January-March, 2021 ) > List of Articles

SYSTEMATIC REVIEW

Rehabilitation of Edentulous Arches with Fixed Prosthesis Supported by Tilted Implants: A Systematic Review

Sudhindra Sudhakar Mahoorkar, V Somwanshi Adesh, Manju George

Keywords : Axial implant, Fixed implant prosthesis, Tilted implant

Citation Information : Mahoorkar SS, Adesh VS, George M. Rehabilitation of Edentulous Arches with Fixed Prosthesis Supported by Tilted Implants: A Systematic Review. Int J Prosthodont Restor Dent 2021; 11 (1):33-53.

DOI: 10.5005/jp-journals-10019-1299

License: CC BY-NC 4.0

Published Online: 12-08-2021

Copyright Statement:  Copyright © 2021; Jaypee Brothers Medical Publishers (P) Ltd.


Abstract

Aim and objective: The aim of this systematic review was to seek evidence and to find the favorable and unfavorable factors for the use of a minimum number of implants in complete arch rehabilitation. Materials and methods: A search of electronic database limited to English language articles was conducted using the following MeSH terms; “dental implant”, “tilted implant”, “axial implant”, “edentulous patient”, “edentulous maxilla”, and “edentulous mandible”, “implant supported dental prosthesis”, “immediate loading and immediate placement”. They were used alone or in combination. Thirty-three articles were selected for the final review which were all clinical studies with human participants and had a follow-up period of 1 year or more. In all the studies included in this review, a minimum of four implants were placed in each arch and one implant placed in each arch was angulated. Results: Of the 33 articles analyzed, 21 (63.63%) articles reported failure of implants. A total of 161 (1.56%) implants failed out of the 10,300 implants placed. In the 161 failed implants, 63 (39.13%) were axially placed implants and 63 (39.13%) were implants place at an angulation. The orientation of 60 (37.27%) implants was not mentioned. Conclusion: The survival rate of tilted implants at the implant and prosthetic levels is good. Tilted implants provide greater surface area for osseointegration, provide greater primary stability, reduce cantilever length, reduce bone resorption, and also reduce the need for bone grafting. The angulation of the implant which provided the most success was found to be 30°.


PDF Share
  1. Balshi TJ, Wolfinger GJ, Slauch RW, et al. A retrospective analysis of 800 Brånemark System implants following the All-on-Four™ protocol. J Prosthodont 2014;23(2):83–88. DOI: 10.1111/jopr.12089.
  2. Agliardi E, Panigatti S, Clerico M, et al. Immediate rehabilitation of the edentulous jaws with full fixed prostheses supported by four implants: interim results of a single cohort prospective study. Clin Oral Implants Res 2010;21(5):459–465. DOI: 10.1111/j.1600-0501.2009.01852.x.
  3. Bassi MA, Andrisani C, Lico S, et al. Upper full arch rehabilitation with sinus by-pass with tilted implants via tapered-threaded expanders in low density bone: a clinical trial. Oral Implantol 2016;9(2):61.
  4. Marchesi M, Ferrari C, Superbi S, et al. Modified protocol of the intraoral welding technique for immediate implant-supported rehabilitation of the edentulous maxilla. Implant Dentis 2015;24(1):110–116. DOI: 10.1097/ID.0000000000000189.
  5. Shackleton JL, Carr L, Slabbert JC, et al. Survival of fixed implant-supported prostheses related to cantilever lengths. J Prosthe Dentis 1994;71(1):23–26. DOI: 10.1016/0022-3913(94)90250-X.
  6. Goené R, Bianchesi C, Hüerzeler M, et al. Performance of short implants in partial restorations: 3-year follow-up of Osseotite® Implants. Implant Dentis 2005;14(3):274–280. DOI: 10.1097/01.id.0000173335.90854.d8.
  7. Renouard F, Nisand D. Short implants in the severely resorbed maxilla: a 2-year retrospective clinical study. Clin Implant Dent Relat Res 2005;7(s1):s104–s110. DOI: 10.1111/j.1708-8208.2005.tb00082.x.
  8. Maló P, de Araújo Nobre M, Rangert B. Short implants placed one-stage in maxillae and mandibles: a retrospective clinical study with 1 to 9 years of follow-up. Clin Implant Dent Relat Res 2007;9(1):15–21. DOI: 10.1111/j.1708-8208.2006.00027.x.
  9. Khayat P, Nader N. The use of osseointegrated implants in the maxillary tuberosity. Pract Periodont Aesthe Dentis: PPAD 1994;6(4):53–61.
  10. Venturelli A. A modified surgical protocol for placing implants in the maxillary tuberosity. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 1996;11:743–749.
  11. Balshi TJ, Wolfinger GJ, Balshi SF. Analysis of 356 pterygomaxillary implants in edentulous arches for fixed prosthesis anchorage. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 1999;14(3):398–406.
  12. Brånemark PI, Gröndahl K, Öhrnell LO, et al. Zygoma fixture in the management of advanced atrophy of the maxilla: technique and long-term results. Scandinavian J Plast Reconstruct Surg Hand Surg 2004;38(2):70–85. DOI: 10.1080/02844310310023918.
  13. Galán Gil S, Peñarrocha Diago M, Balaguer Martínez J, et al. Rehabilitation of severely resorbed maxillae with zygomatic implants: an update. Medicina Oral, Patología Oral y Cirugía Bucal (Internet) 2007;12(3):216–220.
  14. Aparicio C, Ouazzani W, Hatano N. The use of zygomatic implants for prosthetic rehabilitation of the severely resorbed maxilla. Periodontol 2000 2008;47(1):162–171. DOI: 10.1111/j.1600-0757.2008.00259.x.
  15. Maló P, de Araujo Nobre M, Lopes I. A new approach to rehabilitate the severely atrophic maxilla using extramaxillary anchored implants in immediate function: a pilot study. J Prosthe Dentis 2008;100(5):354–366. DOI: 10.1016/S0022-3913(08)60237-1.
  16. Krekmanov L. Placement of posterior mandibular and maxillary implants in patients with severe bone deficiency: a clinical report of procedure. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 2000;15(5):722–730.
  17. Krekmanov L, Kahn M, Rangert B, et al. Tilting of posterior mandibular and maxillary implants for improved prosthesis support. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 2000;15(3):405–414.
  18. Aparicio C, Perales P, Rangert B. Tilted implants as an alternative to maxillary sinus grafting: a clinical, radiologic, and periotest study. Clin Implant Dent Relat Res 2001;3(1):39–49. DOI: 10.1111/j.1708-8208.2001.tb00127.x.
  19. Maló P, Rangert B, Nobre M. “All-on-Four” immediate-function concept with Brånemark System® implants for completely edentulous mandibles: a retrospective clinical study. Clin Implant Dent Relat Res 2003;5:2–9. DOI: 10.1111/j.1708-8208.2003.tb00010.x.
  20. Maló P, Rangert B, Nobre M. All-on-4 immediate-function concept with Brånemark System® implants for completely edentulous maxillae: a 1-year retrospective clinical study. Clin Implant Dent Relat Res 2005;7(s1):s88–s94. DOI: 10.1111/j.1708-8208.2005.tb00080.x.
  21. Calandriello R, Tomatis M. Simplified treatment of the atrophic posterior maxilla via immediate/early function and tilted implants: a prospective 1-year clinical study. Clin Implant Dent Relat Res 2005;7(s1):s1–s2. DOI: 10.1111/j.1708-8208.2005.tb00069.x.
  22. Capelli M, Zuffetti F, Del Fabbro M, et al. Immediate rehabilitation of the completely edentulous jaw with fixed prostheses supported by either upright or tilted implants: a multicenter clinical study. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 2007;22(4):639–644.
  23. Francetti L, Agliardi E, Testori T, et al. Immediate rehabilitation of the mandible with fixed full prosthesis supported by axial and tilted implants: interim results of a single cohort prospective study. Clin Implant Dent Relat Res 2008;10(4):255–263. DOI: 10.1111/j.1708-8208.2008.00090.x.
  24. Maló P, de Araújo Nobre M, Lopes A, et al. All-on-4® treatment concept for the rehabilitation of the completely edentulous mandible: A 7-year clinical and 5-year radiographic retrospective case series with risk assessment for implant failure and marginal bone level. Clin Implant Dent Relat Res 2015;17:e531–e541. DOI: 10.1111/cid. 12282.
  25. Weinstein R, Agliardi E, Fabbro MD, et al. Immediate rehabilitation of the extremely atrophic mandible with fixed full-prosthesis supported by four implants. Clin Impl Dentis Rela Res 2012;14(3):434–441. DOI: 10.1111/j.1708-8208.2009.00265.x.
  26. Krennmair S, Weinländer M, Malek M, et al. Mandibular full-arch fixed prostheses supported on 4 implants with either axial or tilted distal implants: A 3-year prospective study. Clin Implant Dent Relat Res 2016;18(6):1119–1133. DOI: 10.1111/cid.12419.
  27. Agliardi EL, Pozzi A, Stappert CF, et al. Immediate fixed rehabilitation of the edentulous maxilla: a prospective clinical and radiological study after 3 years of loading. Clin Implant Dent Relat Res 2014;16(2):292–302. DOI: 10.1111/j.1708-8208.2012.00482.x.
  28. Crespi R, Vinci R, Capparé P, et al. A clinical study of edentulous patients rehabilitated according to the” all on four” immediate function protocol. Int J Oral Maxillofac Impl 2012;27(2):428–434.
  29. Najafi H, Siadat H, Akbari S, et al. Effects of immediate and delayed loading on the outcomes of All-on-4 treatment: A prospective study. J Dentis (Tehran, Iran) 2016;13(6):415.
  30. Hinze M, Thalmair T, Bolz W, et al. Immediate loading of fixed provisional prostheses using four implants for the rehabilitation of the edentulous arch: a prospective clinical study. Int J Oral Maxillofac Impl 2010;25(5):1011–1018.
  31. Browaeys H, Dierens M, Ruyffelaert C, et al. Ongoing crestal bone loss around implants subjected to computer-guided flapless surgery and immediate loading using the All-on-4® concept. Clin Implant Dent Relat Res 2015;17(5):831–843. DOI: 10.1111/cid.12197.
  32. Francetti L, Romeo D, Corbella S, et al. Bone level changes around axial and tilted implants in full-arch fixed immediate restorations. Interim results of a prospective study. Clin Implant Dent Relat Res 2012;14(5):646–654. DOI: 10.1111/j.1708-8208.2010.00304.x.
  33. Li S, Di P, Zhang Y, et al. Immediate implant and rehabilitation based on All-on-4 concept in patients with generalized aggressive periodontitis: A medium-term prospective study. Clin Implant Dent Relat Res 2017;19(3):559–571. DOI: 10.1111/cid.12483.
  34. Agliardi EL, Francetti L, Romeo D, et al. Immediate rehabilitation of the edentulous maxilla: preliminary results of a single-cohort prospective study. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 2009;24(5):887–895.
  35. Maló P, de Araújo Nobre M, Lopes A, et al. Preliminary report on the outcome of tilted implants with longer lengths (20–25 mm) in low-density bone: one-year follow-up of a prospective cohort study. Clin Implant Dent Relat Res 2015;17:e134–e142. DOI: 10.1111/cid.12144.
  36. Piano S, Romeo E, Sbricoli L, et al. Simplified procedure for the immediate loading of a complete fixed prosthesis supported by four implants in the maxillary jaw: a 2-year prospective study. Clin Oral Implants Res 2016;27(12):e154–e160. DOI: 10.1111/clr.12580.
  37. Lopes A, Maló P, de Araújo Nobre M, et al. The NobelGuide® All-on-4® treatment concept for rehabilitation of edentulous jaws: a retrospective report on the 7-years clinical and 5-years radiographic outcomes. Clin Implant Dent Relat Res 2017;19(2):233–244. DOI: 10.1111/cid.12456.
  38. Maló P, de Araujo Nobre M, Petersson U, et al. A pilot study of complete edentulous rehabilitation with immediate function using a new implant design: case series. Clin Implant Dent Relat Res 2006;8(4):223–232. DOI: 10.1111/j.1708-8208.2006.00024.x.
  39. Sannino G, Barlattani A. Straight versus angulated abutments on tilted implants in immediate fixed rehabilitation of the edentulous mandible: A 3-year retrospective comparative study. Int J Prosthodont 2016;29(3):219–226. DOI: 10.11607/ijp.4448.
  40. Acocella A, Ercoli C, Geminiani A, et al. Clinical evaluation of immediate loading of electroeroded screw-retained titanium fixed prostheses supported by tilted implant: A multicenter retrospective study. Clin Implant Dent Relat Res 2012;14:e98–e108. DOI: 10.1111/j.1708-8208.2011.00379.x.
  41. Francetti L, Rodolfi A, Barbaro B, et al. Implant success rates in full-arch rehabilitations supported by upright and tilted implants: a retrospective investigation with up to five years of follow-up. J Periodon Implant Sci 2015;45(6):210–215. DOI: 10.5051/jpis.2015.45.6.210.
  42. Sannino G, Bollero P, Barlattani A, et al. A retrospective 2-year clinical study of immediate prosthetic rehabilitation of edentulous jaws with four implants and prefabricated bars. J Prosthodont 2017;26(5):387–394. DOI: 10.1111/jopr.12406.
  43. Mozzati M, Arata V, Gallesio G, et al. Immediate postextractive dental implant placement with immediate loading on four implants for mandibular-full-arch rehabilitation: a retrospective analysis. Clin Implant Dent Relat Res 2013;15(3):332–340. DOI: 10.1111/j.1708-8208.2011.00412.x.
  44. Maló P, de Araújo Nobre M, Lopes A, et al. “All-on-4” immediate-function concept for completely edentulous maxillae: a clinical report on the medium (3 years) and long-term (5 years) outcomes. Clin Implant Dent Relat Res 2012;14:e139–e150. DOI: 10.1111/j.1708-8208.2011.00395.x.
  45. Malo P, de Araujo Nobre M, Lopes A. The use of computer-guided flapless implant surgery and four implants placed in immediate function to support a fixed denture: preliminary results after a mean follow-up period of thirteen months. J Prosthe Dentis 2007;97(6): S26–S34. DOI: 10.1016/S0022-3913(07)60005-5.
  46. Tealdo T, Bevilacqua M, Pera F, et al. Immediate function with fixed implant-supported maxillary dentures: a 12-month pilot study. J Prosthe Dentis 2008;99(5):351–360. DOI: 10.1016/S0022-3913(08)60082-7.
  47. Malo P, de Araújo Nobre M, Lopes A, et al. A longitudinal study of the survival of All-on-4 implants in the mandible with up to 10 years of follow-up. J Am Dent Associat 2011;142(3):310–320. DOI: 10.14219/jada.archive.2011.0170.
  48. Di P, Lin Y, Li JH, et al. The All-on-Four implant therapy protocol in the management of edentulous Chinese patients. Int J Prosthodont 2013;26(6):509–516. DOI: 10.11607/ijp.3602.
PDF Share
PDF Share

© Jaypee Brothers Medical Publishers (P) LTD.