International Journal of Prosthodontics and Restorative Dentistry

Register      Login

VOLUME 10 , ISSUE 4 ( October-December, 2020 ) > List of Articles


Detection of Caries under Fixed Prosthodontic Restorations Using Cone-beam CT: A Meta-analysis

Gowri Sivaramakrishnan, Muneera Alsobaiei, Kannan Sridharan, Fatema AlSulaiti

Keywords : Cone-beam computed tomography, Fixed restoration, Secondary caries

Citation Information : Sivaramakrishnan G, Alsobaiei M, Sridharan K, AlSulaiti F. Detection of Caries under Fixed Prosthodontic Restorations Using Cone-beam CT: A Meta-analysis. Int J Prosthodont Restor Dent 2020; 10 (4):170-175.

DOI: 10.5005/jp-journals-10019-1294

License: CC BY-NC 4.0

Published Online: 00-12-2020

Copyright Statement:  Copyright © 2020; Jaypee Brothers Medical Publishers (P) Ltd.


Aim: Secondary caries is the most common cause of failure of fixed prosthodontic restorations and radiography is often depended upon for the detection of caries under these restorations. Current radiographic techniques are specific, but they lack sensitivity. The inherent limitations in two-dimensional radiography led to the development of computed tomographic imaging techniques. Hence, this review aims to compile the available evidence on the utility of cone-beam computed tomography (CBCT) for detecting caries under fixed restorations. Materials and methods: Electronic databases were screened for eligible studies using an appropriate search strategy. Full-texts were obtained and necessary data were extracted. The risk of bias of included studies was assessed using New Castle Ottawa scale. The mean gray values obtained on CBCT were recorded on a Forest Plot using RevMan 5 in Non-Cochrane mode. Mean difference with 95% confidence interval was used as the effect estimate of the mean gray values. Heterogeneity was assessed using Chi-square and I2 tests Results: Three studies were included. Although there was significant heterogeneity between the studies as observed using the I2 values, a statistically significant difference in mean gray values between caries and dentin was observed when CBCT was used under lithium disilicate, zirconia, and metal-ceramic restorations. This indicates that caries can be diagnosed with accuracy under these restorations without the need for removing the restoration. The problem of metal artifacts in CBCT can be reduced if the field of view is small. Conclusion: The results seem to indicate considering CBCT as a possible option if secondary caries is suspected, and in patients with high caries risk. If appropriately used with clinical judgment in high caries risk patients, a possible tooth loss could be prevented.

PDF Share
  1. Tyndall DA, Rathore S. Cone-beam CT diagnostic applications: caries, periodontal bone assessment, and endodontic applications. Dent Clin North Am 2008;52(4):825–841. DOI: 10.1016/j.cden.2008.05.002.
  2. Park YS, Ahn JS, Kwon HB, et al. Current status of dental caries diagnosis using cone beam computed tomography. Imaging Sci Dent 2011;41(2):43–51. DOI: 10.5624/isd.2011.41.2.43.
  3. De Vos W, Casselman J, Swennen GR. Cone-beam computerized tomography (CBCT) imaging of the oral and maxillofacial region: a systematic review of the literature. Int J Oral MaxillofacSurg 2009;38(6):609–625. DOI: 10.1016/j.ijom.2009.02.028.
  4. Teichmann M, Göckler F, Weber V, et al. Ten-year survival and complication rates of lithium-disilicate (Empress 2) tooth-supported crowns, implant-supported crowns, and fixed dental prostheses. J Dent 2017;56:65–77. DOI: 10.1016/j.jdent.2016.10.017.
  5. Kern M, Passia N, Sasse M, et al. Ten-year outcome of zirconia ceramic cantilever resin-bonded fixed dental prostheses and the influence of the reasons for missing incisors. J Dent 2017;65:51–55. DOI: 10.1016/j.jdent.2017.07.003.
  6. Pieger S, Salman A, Bidra AS. Clinical outcomes of lithium disilicate single crowns and partial fixed dental prostheses: a systematic review. J Prosthet Dent 2014;112(1):22–30. DOI: 10.1016/j.prosdent.2014.01.005.
  7. Solá-Ruiz MF, Lagos-Flores E, Román-Rodriguez JL, et al. Survival rates of a lithium disilicate-based core ceramic for three-unit esthetic fixed partial dentures: a 10-year prospective study. Int J Prosthodont 2013;26(2):175–180. DOI: 10.11607/ijp.3045.
  8. Briggs P, Ray-Chaudhuri A, Shah K. Avoiding and managing the failure of conventional crowns and bridges. Dent Update 2012;39(2):78–80. DOI: 10.12968/denu.2012.39.2.78.
  9. Moher D, Liberati A, Tetzlaff J, et al. Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: the PRISMA statement. J Clin Epidemiol 2009;62(10):1006–1012. DOI: 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2009.06.005.
  10. Peterson J, Welch V, Losos M, et al. The Newcastle-Ottawa scale (NOS) for assessing the quality of nonrandomised studies in meta-analyses. Ottawa: Ottawa Hospital Research Institute; 2011. pp. 1–12.
  11. Review Manager (RevMan) [Computer program]. Version 5.3. Copenhagen: The Nordic Cochrane Centre, The Cochrane Collaboration, 2014.
  12. Bilgin MS, Aglarci OS, Erdem A. Posttreatment diagnosis of caries under fixed restorations: a pilot study. J Prosthet Dent 2014;112(6):1364–1369. DOI: 10.1016/j.prosdent.2014.06.014.
  13. Aglarci OS, Bilgin MS, Erdem A, et al. Is it possible to diagnose caries under fixed partial dentures with cone beam computed tomography? Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol 2015;119(5):579–583. DOI: 10.1016/j.oooo.2015.02.004.
  14. Vedpathak PR, Gondivkar SM, Bhoosreddy AR, et al. Cone beam computed tomography- an effective tool in detecting caries under fixed dental prostheses. J ClinDiagn Res 2016. 1010–1013.
  15. Poggio CE, Ercoli C, Rispoli L, et al. Metal-free materials for fixed prosthodontic restorations. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2017;20:12. DOI: 10.1002/14651858.CD009606.pub2.
  16. Terry GL, Noujeim M, Langlais RP, et al. A clinical comparison of extraoral panoramic and intraoral radiographic modalities for detecting proximal caries and visualizing open posterior interproximal contacts. Dentomaxillofac Radiol 2016;45(4):20150159. DOI: 10.1259/dmfr.20150159.
  17. Lurie A. Panoramic imaging. In: White SC, Pharoah MJ, ed. Oral Radiology, Principles and Interpretation. 6th ed., St Louis, MO: Mosby; 2009. pp. 175–190.
  18. Liedke GS, Spin-Neto R, Vizzotto MB, et al. Diagnostic accuracy of conventional and digital radiography for detecting misfit between the tooth and restoration in metal-restored teeth. J Prosthet Dent 2015;113(1):39–47. DOI: 10.1016/j.prosdent.2014.08.003.
  19. Murat S, Kamburoğlu K, Isayev A, et al. Visibility of artificial buccal recurrent caries under restorations using different radiographic techniques. Oper Dent 2013;38(2):197–207. DOI: 10.2341/12-158-L.
  20. Dobbins JT3rd. Tomosynthesis imaging: at a translational crossroads. Med Phys 2009;36(6Part1):1956–1967. DOI: 10.1118/1.3120285.
  21. Mah P, Reeves TE, McDavid WD. Deriving Hounsfield units using grey levels in cone beam computed tomography. Dentomaxillofac Radiol 2010;39(6):323–335. DOI: 10.1259/dmfr/19603304.
  22. Parsa A, Ibrahim N, Hassan B, et al. Reliability of voxel gray values in cone beam computed tomography for preoperative implant planning assessment. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 2012;27:1438–1442.
  23. Han SC, Chung YE, Lee YH, et al. Metal artifact reduction software used with abdominopelvic dual-energy CT of patients with metal hip prostheses: assessment of image quality and clinical feasibility. Am J Roentgenol 2014;203(4):788–795. DOI: 10.2214/AJR.13.10980.
PDF Share

© Jaypee Brothers Medical Publishers (P) LTD.